arXiv:2605.25095cs.AIcs.LG2026-05被引 1

用规则优先的重排序机制,让自动驾驶轨迹选择更安全合规。

RECTOR: Priority-Aware Rule-Based Reranking for Compliance-Aware Autonomous Driving Trajectory Selection

论文配图:RECTOR: Priority-Aware Rule-Based Reranking for Compliance-Aware Autonomous Driving Trajectory Selection
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 基于安全、法律、道路、舒适四层规则,用可微代理评分候选轨迹
  • 规则感知选择使违规率从28.58%降至20.42%,总违规率从40.32%降至32.41%
  • 无需重训练模型,对扰动鲁棒,适合高安全要求的自动驾驶系统

自动驾驶系统需从多模态候选轨迹中选一条;仅依赖模型置信度会忽略安全、交通法规和舒适性约束。本文提出RECTOR(规则约束轨迹协调器),一个后生成阶段的重排序层,通过可微代理和场景相关适用性机制,按安全>法律>道路>舒适的优先级对候选轨迹评分,并采用确定性的ε-字典序规则选择,保持跨层级优先级。在Waymo Open Motion Dataset的validation_interactive数据集上(43,219个增强样本,K=6),在协议B下(28条规则代理库,理想适用性),规则感知选择将安全+法律违规率从28.58%降至20.42%,总违规率从40.32%降至32.41%。加权求和基线虽能匹配二元合规性,但性能提升源于规则感知排序,而字典序保障是结构优势,无法通过权重校准复制。在对抗性置信度污染下,置信度选择在100%场景失败,而规则感知选择均拒绝对抗模式约96%。所有结果为代理评估(非安全认证),开环,5秒时域,美国规则,验证集。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Autonomous driving stacks must pick one trajectory from a multi-modal candidate set; choosing by model confidence ignores safety, traffic-law, and comfort constraints. We present \textsc{RECTOR} (Rule-Enforced Constrained Trajectory Orchestrator), a post-generation reranking layer that scores candidates against a tiered rulebook (Safety~$\succ$~Legal~$\succ$~Road~$\succ$~Comfort) via differentiable proxies and a scene-conditioned applicability mechanism, then selects with a deterministic $\varepsilon$-lexicographic rule that preserves cross-tier priority by construction -- without retraining the predictor. On the Waymo Open Motion Dataset \texttt{validation\_interactive} split (43{,}219 augmented instances, $K{=}6$), under Protocol~B (28-rule proxy catalog, oracle applicability) rule-aware selection cuts Safety+Legal violations from 28.58\% to 20.42\% and Total from 40.32\% to 32.41\% versus confidence-only on the same candidates. A uniform-weight weighted-sum baseline matches binary compliance on this benchmark -- the empirical lift comes from rule-aware ranking, while the lexicographic guarantee is the structural differentiator no weight calibration can replicate. Under adversarial confidence corruption, confidence-only selection fails in 100\% of scenarios while both rule-aware selectors reject the injected mode in $\sim$96\%. All figures are proxy-evaluator results (not a safety certificate), open-loop, 5\,s horizon, U.S.\ rules, validation split.

自动驾驶轨迹选择规则约束重排序

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。