构建首个浮式风电塔筒疲劳预测基准,助力大型风机设计优化。
FLOATBench: A Dataset and Benchmark for Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Tower Fatigue

- 基于19,404次高保真仿真生成58万条疲劳损伤标签。
- 涵盖三类22兆瓦浮式风机塔筒,每塔30个截面的损伤数据。
- 提出分域评估协议,可发现随机划分无法察觉的性能偏差。
全球大部分海上风电资源位于固定基础难以覆盖的深水区,浮式 offshore 风力涡轮机(FOWT)成为深水部署的关键。随着行业向22兆瓦级设计发展,塔筒疲劳问题日益突出,因大尺寸结构放大了风浪持续激励下的气动-水动-伺服-弹性耦合载荷。准确预测疲劳损伤对认证、设计优化和降本至关重要。然而领域内缺乏共享的代理基准:研究采用不同仿真、数据划分与评估指标,导致方法难以比较。本文提出FLOATBench,一个公开的表格型基准,包含三类22兆瓦FOWT塔筒的582,120条分段疲劳损伤标签,源自19,404次高保真OpenFAST仿真(每塔6,468次:1,078个风浪工况点×6个湍流种子),在每塔30个截面处标注。基准包含风浪联合运行包络的分域α形状划分,将测试点分为训练内、插值和外推三类。配套提供可复现的评估框架,涵盖三个层级:随机验证(E1)、塔内分域评估(E2)与跨塔迁移(E3)。分域协议揭示了全局与外推性能间的排名变化,而随机划分的排行榜无法捕捉此现象。据作者所知,FLOATBench是首个面向表格型代理建模的FOWT疲劳基准,其评估协议可推广至基于物理运行包络的工程代理模型。数据与代码已开源:https://github.com/Joao97ribeiro/FLOATBench。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Most of the world's offshore wind resource lies in waters too deep for fixed-bottom foundations, making floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) essential for deep-water deployment. As the industry scales toward $22$ MW class designs, tower fatigue becomes increasingly critical because larger structures amplify the coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic loads induced by continuous wind and wave excitation. Accurate fatigue-damage prediction is therefore central to certification, design optimization, and cost reduction. Yet the field lacks a shared surrogate benchmark: studies report different simulations, splits, and metrics, making methods difficult to compare. We present FLOATBench, a public tabular benchmark with $582{,}120$ per-section fatigue-damage labels across three $22$ MW FOWT tower geometries, derived from $19{,}404$ high-fidelity OpenFAST simulations across the three towers ($6{,}468$ per tower: $1{,}078$ aligned wind/wave operating points $\times$ six turbulence seeds), labeled at $30$ cross-sections per tower. FLOATBench includes a regime-aware alpha-shape partition of the joint wind/wave operating envelope, stratifying test points into in-train, interpolation, and extrapolation regimes. It is paired with a reproducible evaluation harness covering three protocol levels: random validation (E1), within-tower regime-aware evaluation (E2), and cross-tower transfer (E3). The regime-aware protocol reveals rank shifts between global and extrapolation performance that random-split leaderboards cannot detect. To the authors' knowledge, FLOATBench is the first FOWT fatigue benchmark for tabular surrogate modeling, and offers an evaluation protocol that generalizes to engineering surrogates defined over physical operating envelopes. Dataset and code available at: https://github.com/Joao97ribeiro/FLOATBench.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。