arXiv:2605.26099cs.CLcs.AI2026-05

让大模型定期‘睡觉’,用离线循环提升长程推理能力

Do Language Models Need Sleep? Offline Recurrence for Improved Online Inference

论文配图:Do Language Models Need Sleep? Offline Recurrence for Improved Online Inference
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 模型定期将近期上下文转为持久快速权重,清空缓存后‘睡觉’
  • 睡眠时进行N次离线循环更新状态空间模型权重,显著提升复杂推理准确率
  • 适合需要深度推理的长序列任务,如数学题和图谱检索

基于Transformer的大语言模型在长序列任务中应用日益广泛,但其注意力机制随上下文长度增长而性能下降。为此,我们研究了一种类睡眠的巩固机制:模型周期性地将近期上下文转换为持久的快速权重,并清空键值缓存。在‘睡眠’阶段,模型对积累的上下文执行N次离线递归遍历,通过学习到的局部规则更新状态空间模型(SSM)块中的快速权重。推理时,额外计算被转移到睡眠阶段,而唤醒时的预测延迟保持不变。我们在受控合成任务(如细胞自动机和多跳图检索)及真实数学推理任务上进行了测试,发现传统Transformer和SSM-注意力混合模型均失败。结果显示,增加睡眠时长N能提升模型性能,尤其在需深层推理的任务上收益最大。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Transformer-based large language models are increasingly used for long-horizon tasks; however, their attention mechanism scales poorly with context length. To handle this, we study a sleep-like consolidation mechanism in which a model periodically converts recent context into persistent fast weights before clearing its key-value cache. During sleep, the model performs $N$ offline recurrent passes over the accumulated context and updates the fast weights in its state-space model (SSM) blocks through a learned local rule. During inference, this shifts extra computation to sleep while preserving the latency of wake-time prediction. We test our method on controlled synthetic tasks, including cellular automata and multi-hop graph retrieval, as well as a realistic math reasoning task, on which a regular transformer as well as SSM-attention hybrid models fail. We then show that increasing sleep duration $N$ for our models improves performance, with the largest gains on examples that require deeper reasoning.

长序列推理状态空间模型睡眠机制离线循环

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。