arXiv:2605.26324cs.LGcs.AI2026-05中稿 · the AI4Physics Wor…被引 3

用半群一致性诊断物理模拟器的长期误差,发现能有效预判滚动预测失败。

Semigroup Consistency as a Diagnostic for Learned Physics Simulators

  • 通过比较直接演化与分步演化的结果差异,检测模型时间累积错误。
  • 在热传导和伯格斯方程上,半群误差与长时滚动退化相关性达0.635。
  • 适合评估物理模拟器长期稳定性,尤其对自动驾驶等任务重要。

学习型物理模拟器常通过单步或短时预测误差评估,但此类指标难以发现时间组合与长时滚动中的失效。对于自主、状态完备系统,精确解映射满足半群律:直接演化 s+t 时段应与先演化 s 再演化 t 一致。本文提出归一化半群误差作为事后、模型无关的诊断方法,比较直接与分步演化结果。在一维热传导与伯格斯动力学上,采用时间条件卷积网络与FNO基线模型,半群误差与滚动预测退化呈正相关,轨迹级斯皮尔曼相关系数ρ=0.635,95%置信区间[0.621, 0.649]。半群正则化效果参差不齐,表明半群一致性更适合作为评估诊断工具而非通用训练目标。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Learned physics simulators are often evaluated by one-step or short-horizon prediction error, but these metrics can miss failures in temporal composition and long-horizon rollout. For autonomous, state-complete systems, exact solution maps satisfy a semigroup law: direct evolution over $s+t$ should agree with evolution over $s$ followed by $t$. We propose normalized semigroup error as a post hoc, model-agnostic diagnostic comparing these direct and composed learned predictions. On one-dimensional heat and Burgers dynamics with time-conditioned ConvNet and FNO baselines, semigroup error is positively associated with rollout degradation, with trajectory-level Spearman correlation $ρ= 0.635$ and $95%$ CI $[0.621, 0.649]$. Semigroup regularization has mixed effects, supporting semigroup consistency primarily as an evaluation diagnostic rather than a universally beneficial training objective.

物理模拟误差诊断长时预测

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。