AI创作作品的版权归属成难题，本文对比多国法律找解决方案
Examining the Challenges of Intellectual Property in AI-Generated Productions
- 对比伊朗、欧盟、英美等法律体系，分析AI生成内容权属问题
- 发现伊朗现行法律存在明显监管空白，难以应对AI创作挑战
- 建议设立专门版权或明确人类关联方所有权，平衡创新与创作保护
随着人工智能系统能自主生成艺术、文学、音乐作品甚至发明，无需直接人为干预，知识产权制度面临前所未有的挑战。核心问题在于：在缺乏人类创作者的情况下，如何界定作品的署名权与经济权利，以及如何给予此类成果法律保护。本文首先梳理该领域的理论基础与现有文献，进而比较伊朗1969年《作者、作曲家和艺术家权利法》及专利商标注册法，与欧盟、英国、美国等法律体系。同时分析当前关于AI生成作品知识产权的法律观点及执行难点。研究发现，现行伊朗法律框架存在显著监管缺口。为兼顾创新激励与人类创造力保护，修订现有法律并引入新机制——如为AI生成作品设立特定知识产权，或指定相关人类参与者为权利主体——显得尤为必要。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
With the advancement of artificial intelligence systems capable of autonomously generating artistic, literary, musical works, and even inventions without direct human intervention, the intellectual property (IP) regime faces unprecedented questions and challenges. The most critical issue concerns the ownership of moral and economic rights in the absence of a human creator, and how such outputs can be granted legal protection. This paper first reviews the theoretical foundations and existing literature in this domain, then comparatively examines Iranian legal frameworks such as the 1969 Law for the Protection of Authors, Composers, and Artists Rights and the Patent and Trademark Registration Law-alongside other legal systems, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Furthermore, existing legal perspectives on the intellectual property of AI-generated works and the related enforcement challenges are analyzed. The findings reveal significant regulatory gaps within the current Iranian legal framework. To balance the promotion of innovation with the preservation of human creativity, revising existing laws and introducing novel approaches such as defining a specific intellectual property right for AI-generated works or designating ownership among associated human agents appears to be essential.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。