arXiv:2605.27045cs.CL2026-05

用三类认知操控机制检测假信息,解释更透明。

ExTax: Explainable Disinformation Detection via Persuasion, Emotion, and Narrative Role Taxonomies

论文配图:ExTax: Explainable Disinformation Detection via Persuasion, Emotion, and Narrative Role Taxonomies
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 构建17维操纵分类体系,整合说服、情绪与叙事角色
  • 在5个跨领域数据集上宏平均F1达0.8456,优于现有模型
  • 可生成可解释的操纵特征图谱,适合安全审查与内容审核

大语言模型的普及加速了高度流畅的虚假信息传播,传统基于语法语义的验证已难奏效。这类欺骗往往不依赖表面虚假,而是结合说服性修辞、情绪操控和叙事角色建构,通过多重认知路径影响读者判断。现有检测器多聚焦孤立信号(如语法、外部知识、说服力或情感线索),难以捕捉假信息背后的多维度操控意图,也缺乏人类可读的解释。为此,我们提出ExTax——一种对齐分类体系的可解释假信息检测框架。ExTax将说服性修辞、情绪操控与叙事角色统一至17维分类空间,涵盖6种说服策略、5种情绪操控方法和6类叙事角色。它从多个前沿大模型中提取属性,通过熵驱动动态标签平滑化解分歧,并利用异构多头注意力融合分类表示与上下文编码,使每个预测均有可解释的操控画像支撑。在五个跨领域、跨文体基准上,ExTax整体宏平均F1达到0.8456,显著超越最先进深度学习与大模型基线。在严重文体失衡下,其性能仍稳定,而最强深度基线性能从0.9454降至0.6194。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The democratization of LLMs has accelerated the generation and circulation of highly fluent disinformation, making traditional syntax-semantic verification increasingly insufficient. Such deception rarely relies solely on surface-level falsity; instead, it often combines persuasive rhetoric, emotional manipulation, and narrative role construction to influence readers' interpretations through multiple cognitive pathways. However, existing detectors typically emphasize isolated signals -- such as syntax, external knowledge, persuasion, or affective cues -- and therefore struggle to capture the multi-faceted manipulative intents underlying disinformation or provide human-auditable explanations. To address this gap, we present \textbf{ExTax}, a taxonomy-aligned framework for explainable disinformation detection. ExTax unifies persuasive rhetoric, emotional manipulation, and narrative roles into a 17-dimensional taxonomic space, covering 6 persuasive-rhetoric strategies, 5 emotional-manipulation methods, and 6 narrative-role categories. It elicits attributes from multiple frontier LLMs, reconciles their disagreements through Entropy-driven Dynamic Label Smoothing, and fuses the resulting taxonomic representations with contextual encodings via Heterogeneous Multi-Head Attention, grounding each prediction in an interpretable manipulation profile. Across five cross-domain and cross-genre benchmarks, ExTax achieves an overall Macro $F_1$ of $0.8456$, outperforming state-of-the-art deep learning and LLM-based baselines. It also remains robust under severe genre imbalance, where the strongest deep baseline degrades from $0.9454$ to $0.6194$.

假信息检测可解释性多模态分析大模型应用

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。