让强化学习更稳定的关键,是接受离线数据的悲观性。
Off-Policy Learning to Reason Works Because It Is More Pessimistic Than You Think
- 用隐含悲观性设计离线策略目标,避免重要性权重
- 去除权重后训练更稳定,熵衰减变慢
- 适合大规模语言模型推理优化场景
大规模强化学习已成为提升大语言模型推理能力的核心工具。在该规模下,生成常滞后或异步,更新依赖旧策略收集的数据,导致学习本质为离线策略。现有方法多基于PPO类信任区域目标,将训练近似为在线策略,使用重要性权重修正分布偏移。但此类修正易引入高方差、破坏优化稳定性并加速熵坍缩。近期研究提出:不如直接接纳离线数据,舍弃重要性权重,常能获得更强算法。本文构建了一种直观的离线目标形式,涵盖成功实现方案,并揭示其有效性源于隐含悲观性——优化目标对应的实际策略比名义目标更保守。这一视角解释了为何某些实现选择可提升稳定性:它们隐式控制了有效目标分布。随后我们提出一种原则性改进,稳定该诱导分布,进一步提升离线学习效果。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Large scale reinforcement learning has become a central tool for improving reasoning in large language models. At this scale, generation is often lagged or asynchronous, so updates are performed on data collected by older policies. This makes learning inherently off-policy. Most existing approaches nevertheless remain rooted in PPO-style trust-region objectives, treating training as approximately on-policy and using importance weights to correct distribution mismatch. These corrections can introduce high variance, destabilize optimization, and accelerate entropy collapse. Recent work suggests an alternative: rather than correcting the mismatch, one can embrace off-policy data and remove importance weights, often yielding stronger algorithms. In this paper, we provide an intuitive construction of off-policy objectives that include successful off-policy objectives and show that their effectiveness can be understood through implicit pessimism: they optimize toward target policies that are more conservative than their nominal objectives suggest. This perspective explains why some particular implementation choices improve stability: they implicitly control the effective target distribution. We then propose a principled modification that stabilize this induced distribution and improve off-policy learning.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。