arXiv:2605.28176cs.CV2026-05

用软标签提升膝关节骨性关节炎分级准确率

From Kellgren-Lawrence to Calcium Pyrophosphate Crystal Deposition: A Soft-Labelling Framework for Knee Osteoarthritis Assessmen

论文配图:From Kellgren-Lawrence to Calcium Pyrophosphate Crystal Deposition: A Soft-Labelling Framework for Knee Osteoarthritis Assessmen
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用概率分布替代传统标签,更贴合临床分级的有序不确定性
  • 三角形软标签在CPPD分级中表现最优(QWK=0.796)
  • β分布软标签在KL分级中全面领先,显著优于传统方法

传统深度学习方法对膝骨关节炎(KOA)分级依赖独热编码标签,无法捕捉克尔格伦-劳里(KL)和焦磷酸钙沉积病(CPPD)评分的有序不确定性和临床中两者间的非对称关系。研究回顾性收集2172张膝关节X光片,其中968张同时标注了KL与CPPD严重程度。提出基于软标签的有序深度学习框架,将独热目标替换为以标注等级为中心的单峰概率分布,测试了二项式、贝塔、三角形和指数四种形式。所有软标签策略均显著优于基线模型。对于CPPD分级,三角形形式取得最高加权肯德尔系数(QWK=0.796)和最低平均绝对误差(MAE=0.438);贝塔形式在各类别间表现最均衡(平均MAE=0.458,最大MAE=0.573)。对于KL分级,贝塔方法整体最优(QWK=0.777,MAE=0.529,平均/最大类内误差分别为0.523/0.775)。统计分析显示改进显著(p<0.001)。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Background and objective. Conventional Deep Learning (DL) approaches for Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) grading rely on one-hot labels, which fail to capture both the ordinal uncertainty of Kellgren--Lawrence (KL) and Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease (CPPD) severity scores and the asymmetric relationship between the two scales observed in clinical practice. Methods. We retrospectively collected 2172 knee X-ray images, including 968 radiographs jointly annotated for KL and CPPD severity. An ordinal DL framework based on soft-labelling was developed for both tasks, replacing one-hot targets with unimodal probability distributions centred on the annotated grade. Four formulations were investigated: binomial, beta, triangular, and exponential. Results. All soft-labelling strategies consistently outperformed the nominal baseline. For CPPD grading, the triangular formulation achieved the highest Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) and the lowest Mean Absolute Error (MAE) (QWK = 0.796; MAE = 0.438), while the beta formulation yielded the most balanced class-wise performance considering Average MAE (AMAE) and Maximum MAE (MMAE) across classes (AMAE = 0.458; MMAE = 0.573). For KL grading, the beta-based approach provided the best overall performance, achieving the highest QWK together with the lowest MAE and class-wise errors (QWK = 0.777; MAE = 0.529; AMAE = 0.523; MMAE = 0.775). Statistical analysis demonstrated significant improvements over conventional one-hot supervision (p < 0.001).

医学影像软标签骨性关节炎

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。