用新模型模拟行人对自动驾驶车和人工车的不同避撞行为。
Modeling Vehicle-Type-Specific Pedestrian Crash Avoidance Behavior in Safety-Critical Interactions Using Smooth-Mamba Deep Reinforcement Learning
- 用Smooth-Mamba架构学习行人对不同车型的避撞策略。
- 行人对自动驾驶车反应更快,过街速度更低,冲突率更小。
- 适合自动驾驶安全设计与混合交通仿真研究者参考。
随着自动驾驶车辆(AV)与人工驾驶车辆(HDV)共用道路,理解行人在安全关键交互中对不同车型的响应行为对技术安全部署至关重要。本研究从Argoverse 2数据集提取真实世界中的安全关键行人-车辆交互,捕捉实际避撞行为。为建模车辆类型特异性行人避撞行为,提出SMamba-DDPG框架,融合平滑动作约束与高效时序表征学习,分别训练行人与AV及HDV交互的避撞策略。结果表明,该框架在重现行人避撞行为上优于基线强化学习与监督学习模型。重构轨迹表现出强行为真实性,准确还原了两类场景下的避撞运动学特征。反应时间分析显示,行人对AV的响应延迟更短,反应更快;反事实分析揭示行人与AV互动时采用更低过街速度。大规模安全分析表明,行人-AV交互的冲突率始终低于行人-HDV交互,且行人让行率更高。研究强调,在自动驾驶系统设计与混合交通仿真中引入车型特异性行人行为模型的重要性。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
As automated vehicles (AVs) increasingly share roadways with human-driven vehicles (HDVs), understanding how pedestrians respond to different vehicle types in safety-critical interactions is essential for the safe deployment of automated driving technologies. This study extracts safety-critical pedestrian-vehicle interactions from the Argoverse 2 dataset to capture real-world crash avoidance behaviors in encounters involving AVs and HDVs. To model vehicle-type-specific pedestrian crash avoidance behavior, we develop a Smooth-Mamba Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient framework, termed SMamba-DDPG, which integrates smooth action constraints with efficient temporal representation learning. To quantify pedestrian behavioral differences, the framework trains separate crash avoidance policies for pedestrian interactions with AVs and HDVs. Results show that SMamba-DDPG outperforms baseline reinforcement learning and supervised learning models in reproducing pedestrian crash avoidance behaviors. Reconstructed trajectories demonstrate strong behavioral realism, accurately reproducing crash avoidance kinematics in both AV and HDV scenarios. Reaction time analysis shows that the model captures human-like response delays and reveals that pedestrians respond more quickly to AVs than to HDVs. Counterfactual analysis further indicates that pedestrians adopt lower crossing speeds when interacting with AVs. Large-scale safety analysis of model-generated data revealed that pedestrian-AV interactions consistently yielded lower conflict rates and higher pedestrian yielding rates compared to pedestrian-HDV interactions. The findings highlight the importance of incorporating vehicle-type-specific pedestrian behavioral models for safer automated driving system design and more realistic traffic simulations in mixed-traffic environments.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。