arXiv:2605.29236cs.LG2026-05

用时序建模减少ICU误报,提升警报可信度。

SigmaMedStat: Temporal Signal Modeling for ICU False Alarm Reduction

论文配图:SigmaMedStat: Temporal Signal Modeling for ICU False Alarm Reduction
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 将60秒信号分6段,逐段做小波变换并用LSTM捕捉时序特征
  • 在挑战赛数据集上达到0.822的平均AUC,远超静态模型
  • 开源代码和结果,适合医疗AI与重症监护研究者参考

ICU中报警疲劳是严重患者安全问题。临床监护仪每天每病人产生350次以上报警,其中72%-99%为临床无关。医护人员对无效报警麻木,增加漏诊真实紧急情况的风险。本文提出SigmaMedStat,一种机器学习系统,在临床响应前评估生理报警信号的可信度。在498例四通道ICU报警记录的PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2015数据集上评估了四种方法。核心贡献是时序建模框架:将每60秒记录切分为六个10秒片段,对每个片段生成连续小波变换(CWT)谱图,使用共享的EfficientNet-B0编码器提取特征,再输入双层LSTM网络处理特征序列。五折分层交叉验证显示平均AUC为0.822±0.016(95%置信区间:[0.790, 0.853]),显著优于基于整段60秒窗口训练的静态EfficientNet基线模型(AUC 0.641)。消融实验表明,时序分块与多通道信号融合均独立提升分类性能。按报警类型分析发现,心室扑动(Ventricular Flutter)分类最准(AUC 0.820),而停搏(Asystole)最难识别(AUC 0.722)。错误分析指出65个假阴性与85个高置信度误判为主要失败模式。所有代码与结果已公开于https://github.com/Arun-K-Ram/sigmamedstat。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Alarm fatigue in intensive care units (ICUs) is a well documented patient safety crisis. Clinical monitors generate 350 or more alarms per patient per day, out of which 72-99% are clinically irrelevant. Staff desensitization to non-actionable alarms increases the risk of missed true emergencies. This paper presents SigmaMedStat, a machine learning system that evaluates the trustworthiness of physiological alarm signals before clinical action is taken. Four approaches were evaluated on the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2015 dataset of 498 four-channel ICU alarm recordings. Primary contribution is a temporal modeling framework that splits each 60 second recording into six consecutive 10-second chunks, and this in turn generates Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) scalograms per chunk, encodes each chunk with a shared EfficientNet-B0 encoder, and passes the resulting feature sequence to a two-layer Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. Five-fold stratified cross-validation yields a mean AUC of 0.822 +/- 0.016 (95% CI: [0.790,0.853]), compared to 0.641 for a static EfficientNet baseline trained on the full 60-second window. Ablation studies confirm that temporal chunking and multi-channel signal fusion both contribute independently to classification performance. Per-alarm type analysis reveals that Ventricular Flutter is the most accurately classified alarm type (AUC 0.820) while Asystole remains the hardest (AUC 0.722). Error analysis identifies 65 false negatives and 85 high-confidence misclassifications as the primary failure modes. All code and results are publicly available at https://github.com/Arun-K-Ram/sigmamedstat.

ICU警报时序建模小波变换医疗AI

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。