arXiv:2605.30042cs.AI2026-05

多智能体系统通过语义检查点防止策略漂移,提升科学计算自动化的可靠性。

Learning to Choose: An Empowerment-Guided Multi-Agent System with semantic communication for Adaptive Method Selection

论文配图:Learning to Choose: An Empowerment-Guided Multi-Agent System with semantic communication for Adaptive Method Selection
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用上下文相关赌徒与语义检查点保证智能体间决策一致性
  • 在敏感性分析任务中提升策略学习的收敛速度与鲁棒性
  • 适合需要高可信执行流程的自动化科研系统开发者

自动化科学计算工作流不仅需生成可执行代码,更要求自主系统能正确选择计算策略、忠实实施并确保结果因果可追溯。在多智能体流水线中,智能体意图与行为间的微小不一致会导致语义漂移,使最终执行流程偏离原选策略,破坏下游评估与适应能力。受ATHENA框架与赋能理论启发,本文提出融合上下文带权赌徒、结构化跨智能体通信及关键语义检查点的多智能体框架,保障全程动作-结果的一致性。系统整合专用大语言模型代理、基于约束的代码生成与自愈执行循环,构建自适应决策架构。从赋能视角看,可靠自主学习不仅需识别优质动作,还需确保其在智能体间传播的完整性。以敏感性分析与不确定性量化为案例,实验证明未控制的语义漂移会恶化策略学习,而本框架显著提升收敛性、鲁棒性及对新问题情境的适应能力。结果揭示:科学多智能体系统的设计应将自适应决策与显式语义一致性机制结合。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Automating scientific computing workflows requires more than generating executable code: autonomous systems must also select appropriate computational strategies, implement them faithfully, and ensure that the resulting outcomes remain causally attributable to the decisions that produced them. In multi-agent pipelines, this process is particularly fragile, as small inconsistencies between agent intentions and actions can lead to semantic drift, where the eventually executed procedure no longer reflects the originally selected strategy, thereby corrupting downstream evaluation and adaptation. In this work, motivated by the ATHENA framework (Toscano et al., 2025; Toscano et al., 2026) and the concept of empowerment (Yiu et al., 2025), we introduce a multi-agent framework that combines contextual bandits with structured inter-agent communication and, most importantly, semantic checkpoints that preserve action-outcome fidelity throughout the pipeline. The system integrates specialized large language model (LLM) agents, grounded code generation, and self-healing execution loops within an adaptive decision-making architecture. Interpreting the framework through the lens of empowerment, we show that reliable autonomous learning requires not only identifying high-quality actions, but also preserving the integrity of their propagation across agents. Using sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification workflows as representative case studies, we demonstrate that unchecked semantic drift degrades policy learning, whereas the proposed framework improves convergence, robustness, and adaptation to novel problem contexts. These results suggest a broader design principle for scientific multi-agent systems: adaptive decision-making must be coupled with explicit mechanisms that guarantee semantic consistency and reliable information flow across the computational pipeline.

多智能体语义一致性科学计算自主决策

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。