通过自训练验证提升模型在训练和推理时的自我改进能力
Self-Trained Verification for Training- and Test-Time Self-Improvement

- 用参考答案监督模型,让验证器学会识别自生成错误
- 测试时使难题数学准确率翻倍,科学推理任务提升14倍(1.5%→21%)
- 适合需要高精度推理的场景,如复杂问题求解与模型自优化
大规模自我改进是推理模型的长期目标,主要体现在两个层面:测试时通过验证-修正循环实现;训练时通过自训练方法实现。两者均受验证器瓶颈制约:当验证分数虚高而准确率停滞,或反馈过于泛化时,验证-修正循环失效;自训练中若加入错误的自生成数据,同样失败。为突破此困境,本文提出自训练验证(STV)。关键洞察在于:模型无法独立发现自身错误,但能通过参考答案识别。利用这一不对称性构建监督信号,训练验证器模仿更知情的自身版本。测试时,STV显著提升硬核问题的验证-修正效率,优于标准微调、基于分数的强化学习及元验证器等方法。在数学难题上准确率几乎翻倍,科学推理任务提升14倍(从1.5%到21%)。训练时进一步引入‘验证器在环’训练(ViL),以STV验证器反馈指导生成器强化学习,使初始收敛生成器的pass@1再增33%。更关键的是,无需验证器参与测试时,生成器独立表现也较标准强化学习提升30%。因此,未来高难度推理的关键可能在于如何训练与运用验证机制。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Self-improvement at scale has been a longstanding goal for reasoning models, and there are two natural places to do it: at test time, through verification-refinement (V-R) loops; and at training time, through self-training methods. Both are gated by the same bottleneck: the verifier. V-R loops stall when verifier scores inflate while accuracy stagnates, and when feedback is too generic to act on; self-training fails similarly when bad self-generated data are added to training. Better verification would unlock both, but the capability we want to train, i.e., catching self-generated errors, lacks training signal. To address this challenge, we propose self-trained verification (STV). Our key observation is that, while a model cannot catch these errors alone, it can when shown the reference solution. We turn this asymmetry into a supervision target and train the verifier to imitate a more informed version of itself. At test time, STV substantially improves V-R loops on hard problems, while alternatives (e.g., SFT, RL on verifier scores, and even meta-verifiers) do not. STV roughly doubles accuracy on hard math and lifts it 14x on scientific reasoning tasks (1.5% to 21%). At training time, we additionally train the generator using RL with STV verifier's feedback inside the V-R loop - a procedure we call verifier-in-the-loop training (ViL). Starting from an RL-converged generator, ViL yields a further 33% gain in pass@1. More notably, the generator's standalone pass@1, with no verifier at test time, climbs 30% relative past where standard RL had converged. Hence, the next frontier in reasoning on hard problems may lie in how we train for and with verification. Website: https://ar-forum.github.io/stv-webpage
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。