arXiv:2605.31007cs.LGcs.AI2026-05

提出可解释的异常检测模型DEM,兼具高精度与实时性。

DEM: A Distilled Explanation Model for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Physiological Sensor Networks

论文配图:DEM: A Distilled Explanation Model for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Physiological Sensor Networks
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用决策树蒸馏梯度提升机的非线性知识,直接生成可读规则。
  • 在4个数据集上达到0.9964的AUC,推理速度比SHAP快1235倍。
  • 提供可控深度的可读规则,适合临床实时监控场景。

生理传感器网络中的异常检测常由传感器故障、网络中断或数据缺失引发,导致误报。因此需兼具高预测准确率与临床可解释性。现有方法或依赖黑箱模型缺乏透明度,或采用SHAP、LIME等事后解释方法。本文提出蒸馏解释模型(DEM),一种三阶段透明框架,将梯度提升专家模型的非线性知识蒸馏至基于线性基线残差的可解释决策树,使解释即预测本身。DEM引入新颖的蒸馏保真度指标,量化解释树对专家模型非线性贡献的忠实程度,提供可信赖解释的原理性度量。在四个生理数据集(MIMIC-IV、WESAD、eICU及自建SmartNet WBAN语料库)上,DEM在临床情境异常检测中实现0.9964的AUC,可穿戴压力检测达0.9047,同时生成可控深度的人类可读if-then规则。单次1000样本推理仅需0.17ms,较SHAP方法快1235倍,适用于实时生理监测。消融实验表明,相比简单残差拟合,XGBoost蒸馏步骤带来显著性能提升;深度敏感性分析揭示了唯一可用户控制的准确性-可解释性权衡机制。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Anomaly detection in physiological sensor data from Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) can be caused by sensor faults, network disruptions, or missing data, leading to false alarms. Hence, it demands both high predictive accuracy and clinically interpretable explanations. Existing approaches rely either on black-box models that achieve strong performance but offer no transparency, or on post-prediction explanation methods such as SHAP and LIME. In this paper, we propose the Distilled Explanation Model (DEM), a three-stage glass-box framework that distills the non-linear knowledge of a gradient boosting expert into an interpretable decision tree operating on residuals relative to a linear baseline, so that the explanation is not an approximation but the prediction itself. DEM introduces a novel distillation fidelity metric that quantifies how faithfully the explanation tree captures the expert model's non-linear contribution, providing a principled measure of explanation trustworthiness absent from prior interpretable models. Evaluated across four physiological datasets, including MIMIC-IV, WESAD, eICU, and an in-house SmartNet WBAN corpus, DEM achieves an AUC of 0.9964 on clinical contextual anomaly detection and 0.9047 on wearable stress detection while producing human-readable if-then rules at a controllable depth. Inference requires 0.17ms per 1000 samples, rendering DEM 1235x faster than SHAP-based post-hoc explanation and suitable for real-time physiological monitoring. Ablation studies confirm that the XGBoost distillation step provides measurable gains over naive residual fitting, and depth-sensitivity analysis demonstrates an explicit, user-controlled accuracy-interpretability trade-off unique to DEM among existing intrinsically interpretable models.

可解释性异常检测生理传感决策树

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。