arXiv:2606.00102cs.AImath.PR2026-06

从概率看理性演化:数学工具如何重塑科学判断。

On the evolution of the concept of probability as a mirror of the evolution of reason

  • 将概率发展视为理性形态的演变,贯穿历史脉络。
  • 现代贝叶斯推断实现知识与数据的统一,但无法处理概念模糊性。
  • 融合模糊逻辑与深度学习,揭示理性多样性的边界。

数百年来,概率论从博弈计算演变为不确定性推理的核心框架。本文不将其视为纯数学史,而视作理性本身的变迁:从帕斯卡与费马的对称性,到贝叶斯与拉普拉斯的归纳逻辑,再到泊松统计、柯尔莫哥洛夫公理化,概率逐步融入不确定性、时间与一致性。这一进程在塔兰托拉的概率信息逻辑中达到成熟,强调先验知识与数据的协同整合。然而该框架存在局限:它仅量化命题的不确定性,无法形式化描述本身的模糊性。因此文章探讨理性如何超越概率——模糊逻辑提供等级意义与定性判断的严谨语言,深度学习则以几何插值与优化为特征,形成独立于显式推理的强大预测模式。通过共同的历史与认识论视角,三者角色与边界得以澄清。文章主张,当代科学理性不能仅靠数据表现,必须明确表达不确定性、模糊性与推理过程。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Over the centuries, probability theory has grown from the calculus of games of chance into a central framework for reasoning under uncertainty. This article interprets that evolution not merely as a mathematical history, but as a transformation of rationality itself. From Pascal and Fermat's combinatorial symmetry to the inductive logic of Bayes and Laplace, from Poisson's statistics of events to Kolmogorov's axiomatic formalization, probability progressively incorporated uncertainty, time, and coherence into scientific judgment. This trajectory reaches a mature epistemological form in modern Bayesian inference, especially in Tarantola's view of probability as a logic of information, where prior knowledge and data are combined coherently. Yet this framework also exposes a limit: probability quantifies uncertainty about well-defined propositions, but does not by itself formalize the vagueness of the concepts used to describe them. The article therefore examines how rationality extends beyond probability. Fuzzy logic is presented as a rigorous language for graded meaning and qualitative judgment, while deep learning is analyzed as a distinct, powerful mode of prediction based on geometric interpolation and optimization rather than explicit inference. By situating probability, fuzzy logic, and deep learning in a common historical and epistemological perspective, the article clarifies their roles and limits. It argues that contemporary scientific rationality cannot be reduced to data-driven performance alone, but requires the explicit articulation of uncertainty, vagueness, and inference.

概率论理性哲学模糊逻辑深度学习

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。