arXiv:2606.00161cs.CRcs.AI2026-06

用数据增强提升物联网攻击检测,关键少数类识别率显著提高

Improving IoT Intrusion Detection Through SMOTE-Based Oversampling and Extended Multi-Model Evaluation on Side-Channel Power Data

论文配图:Improving IoT Intrusion Detection Through SMOTE-Based Oversampling and Extended Multi-Model Evaluation on Side-Channel Power Data
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 对极不平衡的功耗数据使用SMOTE技术实现1.1:1均衡
  • 随机森林等模型在平衡数据上达到99.89%微F1,优于以往最佳结果
  • 揭示最后时刻功耗信号最重要,适合安全与嵌入式系统研究者

物联网网络入侵检测面临传统机器学习方法难以解决的挑战,尤其在侧信道功耗数据中存在严重的类别不平衡问题,正常样本与攻击样本比例高达75,964:1。本文通过在初始数据集提取的九个子数据集上应用合成少数类过采样技术(SMOTE),使每组数据的不平衡比精确控制在1.1:1。随后,在6小时的平衡数据集上,使用随机森林、梯度提升、LightGBM等八种算法进行统一训练。结果显示,随机森林获得0.9989的微平均F1和0.9794的宏平均F1,优于基线论文中时间序列森林的0.9983。额外树模型性能相当但速度提升十倍。引入宏平均F1指标揭示了以往被忽略的类别级表现差异。混淆矩阵、F1热图与ROC曲线表明,仅在使用SMOTE平衡数据时,复合型攻击(如M+L感染)才能被可靠检测。特征重要性分析显示,60步功耗窗口中最新时刻的信号为最关键预测因子。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The detection of intrusions in IoT-based networks poses challenges that cannot be overcome using traditional machine learning methods. Perhaps the biggest of them is related to the presence of a class imbalance in the side-channel dataset, where the number of samples in the normal class compared to the attacks can reach a ratio of 75,964 to 1. Such an aspect is addressed by Dominguez et al. through the proof of concept of power-based intrusion detection. Unfortunately, neither the authors attempt to cope with the problem of imbalance nor do they assess the classifier performance using a balanced training set. In the current paper, both aspects will be handled at once. First, a Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was performed on all nine possible datasets extracted from the initial one, providing an exact imbalance ratio of 1.1 for each. Then, eight algorithms i.e. Random Forest, HistGradientBoosting, LightGBM, Extra Trees, XGBoost, k-Nearest Neighbors, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Decision Tree were trained under identical conditions for the SMOTE balanced 6-hour dataset. Random Forest reached a micro-averaged F1 score of 0.9989 and macro F1 of 0.9794, thus outperforming the previously best micro-F1 result obtained by Time Series Forest algorithm from the base paper of 0.9983. Extra Trees provided the same performance as well, but at 10 times faster. The introduction of a macro-F1 metric explicitly in contrast to the base paper assessment reveals important class-level information missed with aggregate performance metrics. Recall rates per-class calculated with confusion matrices, F1 heatmaps, and ROC curves show that minority attack classes, especially those with combined M+L infections, are detected reliably only when using SMOTE balance. Feature importance analysis indicates the latest time steps as the most important predictor signals out of 60 steps in a power window.

入侵检测SMOTE物联网安全功耗分析

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。