arXiv:2606.00253cs.ROcs.LG2026-06中稿 · ICRA

按动作组分别评估误差,比总均方误差更可靠。

Per-Group Error, Not Total MSE: Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models for 11-DoF Mobile Manipulation

论文配图:Per-Group Error, Not Total MSE: Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models for 11-DoF Mobile Manipulation
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 按关节组分项评估误差,避免易预测组掩盖难预测组
  • 实机测试中总误差最低的模型表现反而最差
  • 适合有异构动作空间的机器人系统调优

为异构关节空间的移动操作机器人微调视觉-语言-动作(VLA)模型时,总均方误差最低的检查点未必在真实机器人上表现最好。这是因为将机械臂、夹爪、头部和轮式底盘等不同关节组合并为单一指标,导致易预测的关节会掩盖仍出错的关节。本文在11自由度丰田HSR机器人上微调450M的SmolVLA(仅动作专家),并与更强的3.3B预训练基线$π_{0.5}$对比。分组分析显示:SmolVLA的移动底盘收敛最慢,成为性能瓶颈;而对$π_{0.5}$仅微调动作头(冻结主干)时,总均方误差虽低于基线,但机械臂精度下降。60次真实机器人实验(每模型20次)表明,$π_{0.5}$ 80k(4.0/4)显著优于两个微调版本(专家仅3k:3.75/4;HSR-SmolVLA:3.5/4;Mann-Whitney $p \leq 0.010$),尽管后者总误差更低。性能差异与离线机械臂组误差最一致,而非总误差或底盘组误差。结论:对于异构动作空间的机器人,应以每组误差作为检查点选择依据,而非总均方误差。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Fine-tuning Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models for mobile manipulators with heterogeneous joint spaces can produce a counterintuitive result: the checkpoint with the lowest aggregate MSE is not the one that performs best on the real robot. We argue this is a predictable consequence of collapsing heterogeneous joint groups (arm, gripper, head, wheeled base) into a single metric, where easy-to-predict joints can mask joints that still fail. We fine-tune SmolVLA (450M, action-expert only) on the 11-DoF Toyota HSR and compare it against $π_{0.5}$ (3.3B), a stronger pretrained baseline. Per-group analysis exposes two patterns: in SmolVLA, the mobile base converges slowest and limits overall performance. In expert-only fine-tuning of $π_{0.5}$ (training only the action head, backbone frozen), total MSE drops below the baseline but arm accuracy degrades. On 60 real-robot trials (20 per model), $π_{0.5}$ 80k (4.0/4) significantly outperforms both fine-tuned variants (expert-only 3k: 3.75/4; HSR-SmolVLA: 3.5/4; Mann-Whitney $p \leq 0.010$), despite expert-only 3k having the lowest total MSE. This separation is most consistent with the offline arm-group error, not total MSE or base-group error. We conclude that per-group error is a more reliable signal than total MSE for checkpoint selection on robots with heterogeneous action spaces. Code: https://github.com/paumontagut/per-group-mse-vla

机器人微调误差分析多模态

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。