提出以互动为核心的新智能理论,强调人机共创中的动态协作。
Interaction-Centered Intelligence: Toward an Interaction-Based Theory of Human-AI Co-Creation

- 将互动而非单个模型作为智能分析的基本单元
- 智能源于人机在时间中演化出的协作轨迹与参与模式
- 适合关注人机协同、创造性系统设计的研究者
传统人工智能将智能视为封闭个体内部的独立计算。在经典AI、机器学习和诸多生成系统中,分析单位仍是单一模型或自治系统,通过输出、基准测试、预测准确率或优化性能评估。尽管这些方法取得显著进展,却常忽视互动在智能、创造力、意义及适应行为涌现中的作用。本文提出以互动为基本分析单元,构建更广泛的互动中心智能理论。基于分布式认知、具身认知、主动知觉、参与式意义建构、人机交互与计算创意等理论,追溯智能关系化发展的历史脉络。结合创意意义建构、量化共创及如绘图助手、AI绘图伙伴等共创作系统的研究,论证智能产生于代理者、环境与社会技术系统之间持续演化的互动动态,而非仅依赖内部计算。提出互动中心智能框架,用于理解人机共创、协作涌现、适应性参与与互动动态。不只评估输出结果,更关注互动轨迹、协调模式、参与深度、自适应调节及随时间演变的互动漂移。讨论其对可解释共创作AI、混合智能、主动型AI及未来人机系统的启示。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Traditional artificial intelligence has largely conceptualized intelligence as isolated computation occurring within bounded agents. Across classical AI, machine learning, and many generative systems, the dominant unit of analysis remains the individual model or autonomous system evaluated through outputs, benchmarks, prediction accuracy, or optimization performance. While these approaches have produced major advances, they often under-theorize the role of interaction in the emergence of intelligence, creativity, meaning, and adaptive behavior. This paper proposes interaction as the primary unit of analysis for co-creative AI and interaction-centered intelligence more broadly. Drawing from distributed cognition, embodied cognition, enaction, participatory sense-making, human-computer interaction, and computational creativity, the paper traces a historical progression toward increasingly relational accounts of intelligence. Building upon prior work in Creative Sense-Making, quantified co-creation, and co-creative systems such as the Drawing Apprentice and AI Drawing Partner, it argues that intelligence emerges through evolving interaction dynamics among agents, environments, and socio-technical systems rather than solely through internal computation. The paper introduces Interaction-Centered Intelligence as a framework for understanding human-AI co-creation, collaborative emergence, adaptive participation, and interactional dynamics. Rather than evaluating intelligence solely through generated outputs, the framework emphasizes interaction trajectories, coordination patterns, participatory engagement, adaptive regulation, and interactional drift unfolding through time. Implications for explainable co-creative AI, hybrid intelligence, enactive AI, and future human-AI systems are discussed.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。