让金融大模型自动吸收用户复杂需求,避免反复说明。
Absorbing Complexity: An Interaction-Native Knowledge Harness for Financial LLM Agents

- 将用户、市场等多源信息转为结构化知识,主动管理上下文。
- 任务质量达0.815,延迟仅900毫秒,错误率降低96.58%。
- 适合需要高可追溯性与低出错的金融决策类场景。
金融AI代理常因将复杂性转嫁给用户而失败:用户需反复陈述目标、风险偏好、投资组合背景及市场假设,而代理则回答、检索、执行后遗忘。在市场分析、跟单交易审核和交易准备等任务中,遗忘上下文与过时记忆导致延迟、重复错误、审计困难与决策风险。本文提出交互原生知识抓取(InKH)架构,将用户、市场、投资组合与工具事件转化为结构化操作知识。InKH采用被动知识注入构建有限工作上下文缓冲区,使用时序图内存实现低延迟检索,通过维基式审计界面支持可读治理,并结合成熟度、衰减与写入时失效机制进行后台提取。在包含24个随机种子、4轮、每轮80个回合、共6个基线的可复现合成基准上评估,生成46,080次基线条件评估。InKH实现平均任务质量0.815,延迟900毫秒。相比代理驱动的维基遍历记忆,延迟降低82.95%,令牌成本减少82.29%,过时知识使用减少96.58%,质量提升0.108,可追溯性提升0.461。相比无失效机制的时序图系统,质量提升0.050,过时记忆使用减少96.58%,服务成本相当。结果支持金融AI设计核心观点:复杂性应由系统吸收,而非转移给用户。基准验证架构行为,非真实交易表现。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Financial AI agents often fail for a simple reason: they make users carry the complexity. A user must repeatedly restate goals, risk preferences, portfolio context, past judgments, and shifting market assumptions, while the agent answers, retrieves, acts, and forgets. In finance, this is not just inconvenient. In tasks such as market analysis, copy-trading review, and trade preparation, forgotten context and stale memory can create latency, repeated errors, weak auditability, and unsafe decisions. We propose the interaction-native knowledge harness (InKH), an architecture for financial LLM agents that absorbs complexity into the system. InKH converts user, market, portfolio, and tool events into structured operational knowledge. It uses passive knowledge injection to assemble a bounded working context buffer before the main model step, temporal graph memory for low-latency retrieval, a wiki audit surface for human-readable governance, and background extraction with maturity, decay, and write-time invalidation. We evaluate InKH on a reproducible controlled synthetic benchmark with 24 random seeds, 4 rounds, 80 episodes per round, and 6 baselines, producing 46,080 baseline-conditioned evaluations. InKH achieves mean task quality of 0.815 at 900 ms latency. Compared with agent-driven wiki-walk memory, it reduces latency by 82.95 percent, token cost by 82.29 percent, and stale-knowledge usage by 96.58 percent, while improving quality by 0.108 and traceability by 0.461. Compared with a temporal-graph system without invalidation, it improves quality by 0.050 and reduces stale-memory usage by 96.58 percent with comparable serving cost. The results support a design thesis for financial AI: adoption happens when complexity is absorbed by the system rather than transferred to the user. The benchmark validates architecture-level behavior, not live trading performance.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。