arXiv:2606.05660cs.ROcs.AI2026-06被引 1

系统分析长时程机器人操作中的安全问题,梳理三阶段防护策略。

Safe Embodied AI for Long-horizon Tasks: A Cross-layer Analysis of Robotic Manipulation

论文配图:Safe Embodied AI for Long-horizon Tasks: A Cross-layer Analysis of Robotic Manipulation
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 按规划、策略、执行三阶段划分安全干预机制
  • 指出多数安全主张缺乏正式证明,仅依赖统计或经验支持
  • 适合关注机器人长期任务安全的开发者与研究者

具身智能系统在物理环境中需完成长时间跨度的推理与行动,其安全性日益关键,因物理世界中的失误可能伤人、损物或干扰工作。尽管安全具身智能受到广泛关注,现有研究仍分散于规划、策略设计与运行时执行层面。长时程机器人操作是该问题的典型场景,因语义误锚、子任务误差累积、执行漂移及接触密集型风险可在闭环系统中叠加。本文从具身智能视角,系统综述长时程机器人操作的安全性,按干预位置分为规划期、策略期与执行期安全,分析各方向证据强度:区分形式化保证、统计支持与经验安全启发。该框架厘清了基础能力论文、直接安全机制与评估基准的不同作用,揭示当前安全主张中哪些有坚实支撑,哪些仍间接。识别出持续缺口:策略期安全证据有限、接触密集型操作的形式支持薄弱、不确定性触发干预不成熟,且缺乏专用安全基准。最后提出跨层保障、评估设计与真实部署的安全研究方向。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Embodied AI systems are increasingly expected to reason and act over extended horizons in physical environments. This growing capability brings safety to the foreground, because failures in the physical world can harm people, damage objects, and disrupt workplaces. Although safe embodied AI has attracted substantial attention, the literature remains fragmented across planning, policy design, and runtime execution. Long-horizon robotic manipulation is a particularly revealing anchor domain for this problem because semantic misgrounding, subtask-level error propagation, execution drift, and contact-rich physical risk can accumulate within the same closed-loop system. This survey therefore provides a structured review of safety in long-horizon robotic manipulation from an embodied AI perspective. We organize the literature by intervention locus, covering planning-time, policy-time, and execution-time safety, and we analyze the strength of the evidence that each line of work provides, distinguishing formal guarantees, statistical support, and empirical safety heuristics. This framework clarifies the distinct roles of backbone capability papers, direct safety mechanisms, and benchmark or evaluation studies, while exposing where current safety claims are well supported and where they remain indirect. We identify persistent gaps, including limited evidence for policy-time safety, weak formal support for contact-rich long-horizon manipulation, immature uncertainty-triggered intervention, and a shortage of manipulation-specific safety benchmarks. We conclude by outlining research directions for cross-layer assurance, evaluation design, and safer deployment of long-horizon robotic agents in real-world settings.

机器人安全长时程任务具身智能跨层分析

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。