arXiv:2606.05713cs.MMcs.SD2026-06

用判别式读出法提升多模态情感分析精度与效率

Beyond Generative Decoding: Discriminative Hidden-State Readout from a Native Omni-Modal LLM for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis

论文配图:Beyond Generative Decoding: Discriminative Hidden-State Readout from a Native Omni-Modal LLM for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 不靠文本生成,直接从模型隐藏状态映射情感分数
  • 在CMU-MOSI/MOSEI上达到最新最好结果,误差更低
  • 适合追求高效可靠情感分析的开发者与研究者

多模态情感分析(MSA)旨在从语言、声学和视觉信号中推断人类情感。近期方法普遍采用生成式读出:通过提示大模型输出情感分数的文本串。尽管便捷,但将连续回归绑定于离散自回归解码,带来不可测量的成本。本文重新审视该读出机制,提出基于原生全模态大模型(Qwen2.5-Omni-7B)Thinker模块的判别式读出方案。不再进行文本解码,而是通过轻量回归头,在单次前向传播中将最后一个非填充标记的顶层隐藏状态映射为连续得分。结合4位量化与低秩适配(QLoRA),整个70亿参数流水线——包括视频与音频处理——可在单张消费级显卡(RTX 5090,32 GB)上训练,峰值内存仅10–21 GB,可训练参数占比1.14%。在固定骨干网络、数据集与LoRA配置的前提下,我们隔离了读出方式的影响。在CMU-MOSI与CMU-MOSEI数据集上,判别式读出达到最新最好性能(MOSI: MAE 0.551, Corr 0.888;MOSEI: MAE 0.506, Corr 0.790),无需任务特异性特征工程,且多种子稳定性强。相比之下,生成式读出即便经过等量监督训练,平均绝对误差翻倍,出现无法解析或超出范围的输出(零样本占比2.8%),延迟更高。模态消融显示在CMU-MOSI上以文本主导。结果表明,如何读取大模型与如何训练同样关键,判别式读出是连续多模态情感分析更准确、高效、可靠的替代方案。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Multimodal sentiment analysis (MSA) infers human affect from language, acoustic, and visual signals. Recent methods increasingly adapt large multimodal models (LMMs) via generative readout: prompting the model to emit a sentiment score as a text string. While convenient, this ties continuous regression to discrete autoregressive decoding, incurring unmeasured costs. We revisit this readout mechanism and propose a discriminative formulation built on the Thinker module of a native omni-modal LLM (Qwen2.5-Omni-7B). Instead of text decoding, we map the final-layer hidden state of the last non-padding token to a continuous score via a lightweight regression head in a single forward pass. Using 4-bit quantization and low-rank adaptation (QLoRA), the entire 7B pipeline -- including video and audio processing -- trains on a single consumer GPU (RTX 5090, 32 GB) with 10-21 GB peak memory and 1.14% trainable parameters. Through a controlled comparison fixing the backbone, data, and LoRA configuration, we isolate the impact of the readout. On CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI, our discriminative readout reaches state-of-the-art accuracy without task-specific feature engineering (MOSI: MAE 0.551, Corr 0.888; MOSEI: MAE 0.506, Corr 0.790) and exhibits strong multi-seed stability. In contrast, the generative readout -- even after equivalent supervised training -- more than doubles the mean absolute error, yields unparsable or out-of-range outputs (2.8% zero-shot), and suffers from higher latency. Modality ablations reveal a text-dominant regime on CMU-MOSI. Our findings indicate that how an LMM is read out is as consequential as how it is trained, demonstrating that a discriminative readout offers a more accurate, efficient, and reliable alternative for continuous MSA.

多模态分析情感识别模型读出轻量化训练

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。