arXiv:2606.06920cs.LGcs.AI2026-06

小模型微调易翻车,高效方法比全量微调更稳。

The Fine-Tuning Trap: Evaluating Negative Transfer and the Role of PEFT in Sub-1B Mathematical Reasoning

论文配图:The Fine-Tuning Trap: Evaluating Negative Transfer and the Role of PEFT in Sub-1B Mathematical Reasoning
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用参数高效方法(如LoRA)替代全量微调,防止性能下降。
  • 300M以下模型全量微调后准确率反而低于零样本基线。
  • 135M模型用简单提示学习就胜过全量微调,适合边缘部署。

在边缘设备上部署小型语言模型(SLMs)需高效微调策略,以适应新任务而不损害通用能力。本研究对五个子10亿参数模型(135M-1B)在数学推理任务上进行基准测试,发现关键问题:全量微调(Full FT)会显著损害300M以下模型的性能,准确率常低于零样本基线,形成‘负迁移’。这表明参数高效微调(PEFT)不仅是效率选择,更是稳定性必需。研究发现,低秩适应(LoRA)与权重分解LoRA(DoRA)表现相近,但任务依赖性强:DoRA在复杂推理(GSM8K)中更优,而LoRA在模式匹配(OrcaMath)中占优。尤其在对齐模型(Qwen2.5-0.5B)上,全量微调被LoRA超越;在最小模型(SmolLM2-135M)上,甚至不如5次上下文学习。据此建议:所有对齐的子10亿模型默认采用PEFT,避免在500M以下架构使用全量微调,以防灾难性遗忘。实验可复现于https://github.com/gulguluu/tiny-slm-finetune-compare。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Deploying Small Language Models (SLMs) on edge devices requires efficient fine-tuning strategies that adapt models to new tasks without degrading their general capabilities. In this study, we benchmark five sub-1B models (135M-1B) on mathematical reasoning tasks and uncover a critical vulnerability: Full Fine-Tuning (Full FT) actively harms performance in models under 300M parameters, often dropping accuracy below zero-shot baselines. This "negative transfer" makes Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) not just an efficiency preference, but a stability requirement. We find that while Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and Weight-Decomposed LoRA (DoRA) perform comparably, their strengths vary by task; DoRA excels in complex reasoning (GSM8K), while LoRA dominates pattern matching (OrcaMath). In particular, Full FT is outperformed by LoRA on aligned models (Qwen2.5-0.5B) and even by simple 5-shot In-Context Learning on the smallest architectures (SmolLM2-135M). Based on these findings, we recommend defaulting to PEFT for all aligned sub-1B models and caution against Full FT for any architecture smaller than 500M parameters to prevent catastrophic forgetting. Reproduction of this work can be found at https://github.com/gulguluu/tiny-slm-finetune-compare.

小模型微调参数效率数学推理

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。