构建三环架构解决平台化组织中智能体失控问题
The Three-Ring Architecture: Governing Agents in the Era of On-Platform Organisations

- 提出三环治理架构:生产层、策略联邦层、大模型前沿层
- 策略型智能体可追溯可控,大模型智能体具不可逆风险
- 适用于金融、政务等对合规性要求高的企业级场景
当前企业级AI部署面临结构性缺陷:组织获得智能体能力,却缺乏治理基础设施。若不解决,将重现第一波AI部署的错误——去中心化智能无联邦层支撑,导致95%项目失败。本文提出三环架构作为平台化组织的治理框架:环1为现有生产架构;环2是基于策略的智能体联邦层,承担资源抽象、流程协调、权限管控等操作系统级功能;环3是基于大语言模型的前沿智能层。关键区分在于风险属性:策略型智能体在确定性框架内运行,行为可追溯、可恢复;而大模型智能体属非确定性主体,其偏差在组织系统中传播且无法事后追溯。环2并非可选组件,而是控制与合规的必要条件。更关键的是,大模型能力越强,失控后果越严重,治理需求随之线性增长。该架构已在金融、政府、采购、合规等领域十年实践中验证有效。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The current phase of enterprise AI deployment faces a structural failure: organisations are acquiring agentic capability without the infrastructure to govern it. The result is expected to reproduce the error of the first wave of AI deployment: decentralised intelligence without a federation layer leading to a 95% project failure rate. This paper formalises the Three-Ring Architecture as the governing infrastructure of the on-platform organisation. Ring 1 is the existing production architecture; Ring 2 is the M2 federation layer built on strategies-based agentic AI; Ring 3 is the LLM-based frontier intelligence layer. Ring 2 constitutes, in the technically exact sense, the operating system of the agentic enterprise - performing at the organisational level what a computing OS performs at the device level: resource abstraction, process coordination, permission enforcement, and a stable platform for compounding intelligence. A central contribution is the formal distinction between Ring 2 and Ring 3 risk profiles. Strategies-based agents operate within a deterministic framework: their consequences are traceable, their permissions enforceable, their deviations recoverable. LLM-based agents introduce a categorically distinct risk: a non-deterministic actor whose deviations propagate through complex organisational systems without retrospective traceability. Ring 2 is not a useful addition - it is a necessary condition of control and compliance. A further consequence: every improvement in LLM capability is a structural tailwind for this architecture. More capable non-deterministic actors produce larger consequences when they deviate. The governance requirement scales with capability. The architecture has been validated across a decade of deployment in financial services, government, procurement, and compliance among other sectors.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。