提出文化多元治理框架，应对AI对人类价值观的隐性侵蚀。
Memetic Capture: A Pluralistic Policy Framework for Governing AI-Driven Cultural Disempowerment
- 构建四层政策架构，融合文化影响力度量与民主价值协商
- 强调多元共治是防止文化单极化的结构性必需
- 适合关注AI伦理、文化安全与跨域治理的研究者
文化是人工智能导致人类渐进式失能的最隐蔽路径：与经济或政治剥夺不同，文化剥夺直接攻击人类识别并抵抗失能所依赖的价值偏好。现有AI治理框架因将文化影响视为次级议题而存在根本盲区。本文提出‘模因捕获’作为人工智能引发文化失能的统摄概念，并构建‘文化多元治理框架（CPGF）’，包含四层机制：量化文化影响力指标、民主价值协商机制、多元部署标准及跨国协调机制。强调多元主义不仅是伦理要求，更是防止治理本身加剧失能的结构性必需。文中识别了具体政策抓手，讨论实施张力，并提出多元对齐与文化治理交叉领域的研究议程。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Culture is the most insidious vector of gradual human disempowerment by AI: unlike economic or political displacement, cultural displacement attacks the very preferences and values through which humans recognise and resist disempowerment itself. We argue that existing AI governance frameworks suffer from a critical blind spot by treating cultural impact as secondary to economic and safety concerns. This paper develops \emph{memetic capture} as a unifying concept for AI-driven cultural disempowerment, and proposes the \textbf{Cultural Pluralistic Governance Framework (CPGF)}, a four-tier policy architecture combining quantitative cultural influence metrics, democratic value assemblies, pluralistic deployment standards, and transnational coordination mechanisms. We argue that pluralism is not merely an ethical requirement for such governance but a structural necessity: monocultural AI governance accelerates the very disempowerment it claims to prevent. We identify concrete policy levers, discuss implementation tensions, and outline a research agenda at the intersection of pluralistic alignment and cultural AI governance.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。