arXiv:2606.09037cs.AIcs.MA2026-06

用AI代理系统优化电机设计,降低计算成本并提升可靠性。

A Multi-Agent System for Motor Design Optimization via an FEA-AI Hybrid Approach

论文配图:A Multi-Agent System for Motor Design Optimization via an FEA-AI Hybrid Approach
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 构建多智能体框架,自动处理设计问题与几何采样失败。
  • 混合模型在相同计算量下铁损降低44%,计算时间减少52%-55%。
  • 适合需要高效仿真驱动设计的工程师和自动化研究者。

本研究提出一种基于大语言模型(LLM)的多智能体框架,用于内嵌永磁同步电机(IPMSM)设计优化,解决传统流程中依赖专家设定、数据准备繁琐、有限元分析(FEA)计算成本高以及AI代理在未探索区域不可靠等问题。设计智能体利用检索增强生成,将电机设计问题回答准确率从不足50%提升至67%-80%;训练智能体通过推理求解器失败历史,修复不合理的设计空间,使几何采样成功率从28%提升至84%;优化智能体采用不确定性感知的FEA-AI混合模型:以AI代理为主评估,仅在预测不确定性高时调用FEA。在相同FEA预算下,单目标优化铁损降低44%,多目标优化超体积提高22.5%;相同评估预算下,计算时间减少52%-55%,同时保持90%-92%的FEA-only超体积。相反,纯AI搜索收敛至错误最优解,一半帕累托解不可行。控制器智能体自适应调整触发FEA的不确定性阈值,无需人工调参,相比固定阈值实现5.8%更低的铁损。结果表明,具备不确定性感知的混合评估机制是可靠、可扩展的仿真驱动设计自动化范式。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This study presents a large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent framework for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) design optimization that mitigates limitations of conventional workflows: expertise-dependent problem setup and data preparation, the prohibitive computational cost of finite element analysis (FEA), and the unreliability of AI surrogates in unexplored regions. To this end, we first introduce a Design agent that formulates the optimization problem in natural language, leveraging retrieval-augmented generation to improve answer accuracy on motor design problems from below 50% to 67-80%. Furthermore, a Training agent autonomously repairs improperly defined design spaces by reasoning over solver failure history, raising the success ratio of the geometry sampling from 28% to 84% for AI training. Additionally, to resolve cost and reliability simultaneously, an Optimization agent employs an uncertainty-aware FEA-AI hybrid model: the AI surrogate is the primary evaluator, and FEA is selectively invoked where predictive uncertainty is high. Under the same FEA budget, this hybrid model achieves up to 44% lower iron loss in single-objective and 22.5% higher hypervolume in multi-objective optimization than conventional FEA-only search. Under the same evaluation budget, it reduces computation time by 52-55% while retaining 90-92% of FEA-only hypervolume. Conversely, AI-only search converges to false optima, leaving half its Pareto designs infeasible. Notably, a controller agent adaptively updates the uncertainty threshold that triggers FEA each round, eliminating manual tuning and achieving 5.8% lower single objective iron loss than with a fixed threshold. These results establish domain specialized LLM agents with uncertainty-aware hybrid evaluation as a reliable, scalable paradigm for simulation-driven design automation.

电机设计多智能体混合建模仿真优化

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。