arXiv:2606.09105cs.AI2026-06被引 2

用知识图谱增强科研创意生成,让大模型更懂论文间的关联。

Graph2Idea:Retrieval-Augmented Scientific Idea Generation with Graph-Structured Contexts

论文配图:Graph2Idea:Retrieval-Augmented Scientific Idea Generation with Graph-Structured Contexts
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 将文献转为结构化三元组,构建目标中心的知识图谱
  • 相比基线,创意新颖性、质量与可行性分别提升0.07、0.05、0.06
  • 适合需要深度整合已有研究的科研人员使用

生成新颖、可行且高质量的科研创意是科学发现中的重要但具挑战性的任务。现有基于大语言模型的方法虽通过检索文献来支撑创意生成,但通常仅提供扁平文本(如标题、摘要),易含冗余或弱相关信息,且难以识别不同论文间问题、方法、机制与发现之间的关联。为此,我们提出 Graph2Idea,一个基于知识图谱的检索增强型科研创意生成框架。该框架首先根据输入主题检索论文,将其转化为结构化知识三元组,并动态构建以目标为中心的知识图谱,使文献间关系显式化;随后提取紧凑的图导出上下文,保留与目标相关的关联证据,同时减少噪声文本输入。在此基础上,采用两阶段生成流程:先识别有潜力的研究方向,再引导大模型基于图结构证据合成候选创意。在科学创意生成基准上的实验表明,Graph2Idea 在自动评估中优于代表性基线。相比最强基线,其新颖性从0.45提升至0.52,质量从0.24升至0.29,可行性从0.22增至0.28。结果表明,结构化知识图谱有助于大模型通过更明确、紧凑且可追溯的方式重组已有科学知识。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Generating novel, feasible, and high-quality research ideas is an important yet challenging task in scientific discovery. Recent Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods often ground idea generation with retrieved literature, but the retrieved evidence is usually provided as flat text, such as titles, abstracts, or summaries. Such flat contexts may contain redundant or weakly relevant information, while making cross-paper relations among problems, methods, mechanisms, and findings difficult to identify and trace. To address this challenge, we propose Graph2Idea, a knowledge graph-guided framework for retrieval-augmented scientific idea generation.Graph2Idea first retrieves papers according to the input topic, transforms them into structured knowledge triples, and dynamically constructs a target-centered knowledge graph to make literature relations explicit. It then extracts compact graph-derived contexts that retain target-relevant relational evidence while reducing noisy textual input. Based on these contexts, a two-stage generation process first identifies promising research directions and then guides the LLM to synthesize candidate ideas from graph-grounded evidence. Experiments on a scientific idea generation benchmark show that Graph2Idea outperforms representative baselines under the automatic evaluation protocol. Compared with the strongest baseline scores, it improves Novelty from 0.45 to 0.52, Quality from 0.24 to 0.29, and Feasibility from 0.22 to 0.28. These results suggest that graph-structured evidence helps LLMs generate research ideas through more explicit, compact, and traceable recombination of prior scientific knowledge.

科研创新知识图谱大模型应用

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。