用认知图谱+LLM构建情绪唤醒预测模型,提前识别恐慌发生时机。
When Cognitive Graphs Meet LLMs: BDEI Cognitive Pathways for Panic Emotional Arousal Prediction

- 基于评估情绪理论构建信念-欲望-情绪-意图路径,显式建模情绪生成过程。
- 在飓风桑迪数据上,预测时间准确率提升10.68%,峰值错误降低至7.07%。
- 通过心理安全距离筛选高风险个体,限制LLM仅参与参数估计,防幻觉扩散。
在恐慌情绪表现前预测其发生时间对主动应急干预至关重要。现有方法虽融入认知要素,但未显式建模情绪唤醒过程,难以准确预测时间。我们主张基于评估情绪理论进行建模,但需解决三个问题:(1) 评估理论认为情绪源于多维威胁的同步评估,而此前工作未能融合多源信号形成统一风险感知;(2) 现有认知模型缺乏显式的‘情绪节点’,使威胁评估与情绪唤醒脱钩,情绪需间接从行为推断;(3) 当前方法使用LLM作为主决策者,但其输出脆弱且易产生幻觉。为此,我们提出PanicCognitivePath(PCP)框架:基于心理距离理论的PSD模型将四维信号映射为统一风险度量,作为认知推理入口;在BDI中引入基于评估理论的显式情绪节点,构成信念-欲望-情绪-意图(BDEI)路径;当风险度量超过阈值时,个体进入该路径,实现威胁评估与情绪唤醒的直接耦合;整个状态转移由BDEI路径控制,而LLM仅负责信念到欲望的参数估计,将幻觉限制于单一步骤,避免误差传播。在飓风桑迪数据集上的实验表明,PCP相较基线提升情绪唤醒时间预测准确率10.68%,峰值计数误差降至7.07%。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Predicting individual panic emotional arousal timing before manifestation is essential for proactive emergency intervention. Existing methods incorporate cognitive elements but none explicitly model the emotional arousal process, making them ill-suited for emotional arousal timing prediction. We argue that grounding prediction in appraisal emotion theory is necessary because it explicitly models this process, but three problems must be solved. (1) Appraisal theory posits that emotion arises from simultaneous evaluation across multiple threat dimensions, yet no prior work fuses these inputs into risk perception. (2) Existing cognitive models lack an Emotion node, decoupling threat appraisal from emotional arousal and forcing emotions to be inferred indirectly from behaviors. (3) Given their generalizable cognitive reasoning, current approaches adopt LLMs as the primary decision-maker, yet overlook the fragility and hallucination-proneness of their outputs. To address these issues, we introduce PanicCognitivePath (PCP), a framework that addresses all three. A Psychological Safety Distance (PSD) model, grounded in psychological distance theory, maps four-domain signals into a unified risk metric as the entry condition for subsequent cognitive reasoning. An explicit Emotion node grounded in appraisal emotion theory is introduced into BDI, forming a Belief-Desire-Emotion-Intention (BDEI) pathway. Agents whose risk metric exceeds the PSD threshold enter this pathway, coupling threat appraisal directly to emotional arousal. The BDEI pathway governs all state transitions while the LLM is confined to parameter estimation for the Belief-to-Desire transition, confining hallucinations to a single step and preventing error propagation. Experiments on Hurricane Sandy show PCP improves arousal timing accuracy by 10.68% over baselines, reduces peak count error to 7.07%.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。