用思维链强化学习提升有害梗图识别与解释能力
Adapting Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Thought Supervision for Explainable Detection of Hateful and Propagandistic Memes

- 通过思维链监督和强化学习优化多模态模型的推理过程
- 在英文和阿拉伯语数据集上准确率最高提升7.6点,解释质量显著改善
- 适合需要可解释内容审核的AI安全与伦理研究者
有害传播性梗图利用图文交互传递单一模态无法揭示的恶意意图。尽管基于思维的多模态大模型(MLLMs)已推动视觉语言理解发展,其在梗图内容审核中的应用仍不充分。本文提出一种基于强化学习的后训练方法,通过任务特定奖励与组相对策略优化(GRPO),同时提升分类性能与基于参考的解释质量。具体包括:(i) 在英语与阿拉伯语基准上系统评估现有多模态模型对有害梗图的理解能力;(ii) 通过蒸馏与多大模型细粒度标注,扩展现有梗图数据集并引入弱监督思维链(CoT)推理;(iii) 提出结合思维长度正则化的GRPO目标函数,联合优化分类准确率与解释质量;(iv) 探索使用共识伪标签进行无监督自监督GRPO训练。在Hateful Memes与ArMeme基准上的实验表明,本方法在FHM准确率上最高提升2.1%(从79.9%到82.0%),在ArMeme宏平均F1上最高提升7.6点(从0.536到0.612,含解释);同时生成自然语言解释。在ArMeme上,序列分类基线虽原始准确率更高,但本方法实现更均衡的类别表现并提供解释。代码、数据扩展与评估资源已公开。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Hateful and propagandistic memes exploit the interplay between images and text to convey harmful intent that neither modality reveals alone. Although thinking-based multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced vision-language understanding, their application to meme content moderation remains underexplored. We propose a reinforcement learning-based post-training method that improves classification performance and reference-based explanation quality in thinking-based MLLMs via task-specific rewards and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Concretely, we (i) conduct a systematic empirical study of off-the-shelf MLLMs for hateful and propagandistic meme understanding across English and Arabic benchmarks, (ii) extend existing meme datasets with weakly supervised chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales via distillation and multi-LLM fine-grained propaganda annotations, (iii) introduce a GRPO-based objective with thinking-length regularization that jointly optimizes classification accuracy and explanation quality, and (iv) investigate self-supervised GRPO on unlabeled memes using consensus-based pseudo-labels. Experiments on the Hateful Memes and ArMeme benchmarks show that our approach improves over previously reported results on FHM accuracy (up to +2.1%, from 79.9% to 82.0%) and on ArMeme macro-F1 (up to +7.6 points, from 0.536 to 0.612 with explanations; +6.1 compared to the original ArMeme benchmark), while also generating natural-language explanations. On ArMeme, sequence-classification baselines remain stronger in terms of raw accuracy, whereas our approach provides more balanced per-class performance along with explanations. We publicly release our code, data extensions, and evaluation resources.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。