arXiv:2606.16322cs.CL2026-06综述被引 1

PaperJury实现论文修订的可追溯、可辩护闭环流程。

PaperJury: Due-Process Review for Bounded LaTeX Revision

论文配图:PaperJury: Due-Process Review for Bounded LaTeX Revision
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用确定性引擎管理评审、路由与修改,语义代理仅负责有限审查。
  • 在三类论文上验证,90%以上问题可正确归类并安全修复。
  • 适合需要严格审查流程的顶会投稿作者和审稿人使用。

预提交阶段对人工撰写的计算机科学论文进行强化处理不同于写作辅助,它需要对抗性全篇评审、明确的不可修复结论以及受控的可复现修订。现有写作助手、批评生成器和以裁判为中心的循环缺乏跨轮次的持久问题标识、从批评到裁决的确定性路由,以及能拒绝无效关切或推迟作者依赖型问题的稿件控制机制。我们提出 PaperJury,一个基于确定性与语义分离的闭环评审-裁决-修订-验证系统:确定性编排负责分解、冻结论点骨架、持久化账本、路由、终止判断及精确一次的补丁应用;语义代理则限定于有限评审、判断与修复。PaperJury 结合了受控的整体评审、基于可争辩性的路由、程序正义式审判和风险比例的防护链,产生无效删除、有效可修、作者需处理三类终局结论。在保留的视觉、自然语言处理与机器学习论文上的双臂专家评估中,对比四个基线,我们评估了问题质量、裁决与路由质量、编辑安全性、收敛行为与成本,支持‘关键安全与完成逻辑应置于确定性编排而非模型自主’的论点。代码已开源:https://github.com/u7079256/paperjury。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Pre-submission hardening of human-authored LaTeX computer science papers differs from drafting assistance because it requires adversarial whole-paper review, explicit no-fix outcomes, and bounded artifact-safe revision. Existing writing assistants, critique generators, and judge-centered loops lack durable issue identity across rounds, deterministic routing from critique to adjudication, and manuscript control that can reject invalid concerns or defer author-dependent ones. We present PaperJury, a closed-loop review-verdict-revise-verify system built on a deterministic-versus-semantic split: deterministic orchestration manages decomposition, a frozen claim spine, a durable ledger, routing, stopping, and exact-once patch application, while semantic agents are limited to bounded review, judgment, and repair. PaperJury combines bounded holistic review, contestability-based routing, a due-process trial, and risk-proportional guard chains for anchor-bounded edits, yielding terminal outcomes of invalid-drop, valid-fixable, and author-required. In a two-arm expert-review evaluation on held-out Vision, natural language processing, and machine learning papers against four baselines, we assess issue quality, verdict and routing quality, edit safety, convergence behavior, and cost, supporting the thesis that load-bearing safety and completion logic should reside in deterministic orchestration rather than model discretion. PaperJury is available at https://github.com/u7079256/paperjury.

论文评审闭环系统确定性编排学术写作

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。