arXiv:2606.17555cs.CRcs.AI2026-06

用AI Agent同时识别银行零售与企业账户的欺诈与洗钱行为

An AI Security Agent for Banking: Multi-Vector Fraud and AML Detection Across Retail and Corporate Accounts

论文配图:An AI Security Agent for Banking: Multi-Vector Fraud and AML Detection Across Retail and Corporate Accounts
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 分交易与会话双流,融合时序、统计与图神经网络检测异常
  • 在13类威胁中实现0.787(交易)和0.867(会话)的F1分数
  • 支持实时响应,适合银行安全团队与反欺诈系统部署

银行面临两类本质不同的威胁:基于签名的欺诈(如非面对面攻击、账户盗用、取款机克隆)和基于行为的金融犯罪(如拆分交易、分层洗钱、资金过账网络、商业邮件欺骗)。静态规则引擎虽能捕捉高频率事件,但对伪装成合法行为的邮件欺骗付款重定向、会话劫持和洗钱分层无能为力。本文提出一个面向零售与企业银行的AI安全代理,采用三组件融合架构处理两条并行事件流:交易流(信用卡欺诈、ACH/电汇欺诈、反洗钱)与会话流(账户盗用、劫持、SIM卡更换、内部滥用)。每条流结合账户级行为的LSTM序列模型、统计速度/阈值监控器,以及捕获账户对手方模式(入度、出度、过账率)的图模块以检测洗钱。在包含237,669笔交易与113,508个会话、覆盖13类威胁和3,470个账户的合成日志上,整体F1分别为0.787(交易)和0.867(会话),优于规则基线(0.562/0.733)与仅用LSTM的基线(0.655/0.713)。该代理还集成客户验证聊天机器人(身份识别准确率96.6%,批量重置检测率86.8%)与分析师案件摘要助手(动作推荐F1达99.3%),关键级别响应延迟在95百分位下低于0.43毫秒。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Banks face two threat families with fundamentally different detection requirements: signature-based fraud (card-not-present attacks, account takeover, ATM cloning) and behavioural financial crime (structuring, layering, mule networks, business email compromise). Static rule engines catch high-velocity events but remain blind to BEC payment redirection, session hijacking, and laundering layering, which are engineered to resemble legitimate activity at the individual level. This paper presents an AI security agent for retail and corporate banking using a three-component fusion architecture across two parallel event streams: transactions (card fraud, ACH/wire fraud, AML) and sessions (account takeover, hijacking, SIM-swap, insider abuse). Each stream combines an LSTM sequence model of per-account behaviour, a statistical velocity/threshold monitor, and a graph module capturing account-counterparty patterns (fan-in, fan-out, pass-through ratio) for laundering detection. Experiments on a synthetic log of 237,669 transactions and 113,508 sessions across 13 threat categories and 3,470 accounts show overall F1 of 0.787 (transaction) and 0.867 (session), versus 0.562/0.733 for a rule-based baseline and 0.655/0.713 for an LSTM-only baseline. The agent also includes a customer-facing verification chatbot (96.6% identity accuracy, 86.8% mass-reset detection) and an analyst case-summary assistant (99.3% action recommendation F1), with Critical-tier response latency under 0.43 ms at the 95th percentile.

AI安全反欺诈银行风控图神经网络

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。