arXiv:2606.19350cs.CL2026-06中稿 · ICLR

通过因果评估剪枝,让大模型推理能力在压缩后仍保持更强

Pruning via Causal Attribution Preserves Reasoning Performance in Large Language Models

论文配图:Pruning via Causal Attribution Preserves Reasoning Performance in Large Language Models
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 基于因果影响评估每个注意力头的重要性,指导精细剪枝
  • 在ARC-Challenge上,20%稀疏度下比Wanda提升61%准确率
  • 适合关注推理性能的模型压缩研究者,尤其对长链推理任务有效

大型语言模型(LLMs)擅长多步推理但推理开销大。本文提出无需训练的因果归因剪枝(CAP),通过测量注意力头在少量推理题上的干预影响来识别关键头,并将其重要性转化为投影矩阵的权重级评分。相比仅依赖幅度或激活值的剪枝方法,CAP的干预性测量更直接反映头的功能贡献。在使用Llama-3-8B-Instruct和Mistral-7B-Instruct评估GSM8K、StrategyQA和ARC-Challenge时,20%稀疏度下,于ARC-Challenge上相对于Wanda实现最高达61%的相对准确率提升。在10%-20%稀疏度范围内,多数配置下表现优于Wanda,尤其在Llama-3上表现突出。结果表明,头级因果归因比相关性剪枝更有效保留下游推理性能,但在50%稀疏度下受粗粒度MLP归因限制。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large language models (LLMs) excel at multi-step reasoning but incur substantial inference cost. We introduce Causal Attribution Pruning (CAP), a training-free method that identifies critical attention heads by measuring their causal impact on reasoning tasks and uses these head-level scores to guide fine-grained weight pruning. For each attention head, CAP estimates the expected performance degradation when the head is masked during forward passes on a small calibration set of reasoning problems. These causal scores are then converted into weight-level importance values for the corresponding projection matrices. Unlike magnitude-only or activation-based criteria, CAP's interventional measurement directly captures each head's functional contribution, yielding relative accuracy gains of up to 61% over Wanda on ARC-Challenge at 20% sparsity. We evaluate CAP on GSM8K, StrategyQA, and ARC-Challenge using Llama-3-8B-Instruct and Mistral-7B-Instruct at 10%, 20%, and 50% sparsity. At moderate sparsity (10-20%), CAP improves over Wanda in most model-benchmark configurations. with especially large gains on ARC-Challenge for Llama-3. Our results suggest that attention-head-level causal attribution can better preserve reasoning performance on downstream benchmarks than correlational pruning criteria at equivalent sparsity, while remaining limited by coarse MLP attribution at 50% sparsity.

模型剪枝推理能力因果分析

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。