让编辑参与设计大模型，把专业判断融入知识传播系统。
Editorial Alignment: A Participatory Approach to Engaging Editorial Expertise in LLM-mediated Knowledge Dissemination
- 通过参与式设计工作坊，让编辑主导大模型界面的对齐改造。
- 在北欧公共知识机构案例中实现编辑标准与技术系统的融合。
- 为编辑赋权，使其在大模型知识传播中保持主动角色。
大语言模型驱动的信息服务正在重塑公共知识机构的运作环境，可能吞噬这些机构本应承担的编辑职能。尽管大模型为知识传播提供了强大能力，但其预训练模型已默认对齐商业开发者的价值观和传播策略，削弱了编辑权威。本文通过案例研究，探讨编辑如何参与重构大模型界面以符合编辑标准。我们与北欧一家公共知识机构合作，设计并实现了一个大模型赋能的百科全书界面。提出“编辑对齐”作为参与式人工智能中的设计实践，将编辑标准视为可转化的技术对齐目标。最后讨论该方法如何为编辑提供持续参与空间，赋予其在大模型知识传播中的决策权。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The emergence of LLM-driven information services is reshaping the conditions under which public knowledge institutions operate, threatening to absorb the editorial function these institutions exist to exercise. While LLMs offer powerful new affordances for knowledge dissemination, editorial authority is challenged by pretrained LLMs that arrive already aligned with the values and dissemination strategies of their commercial developers. This paper investigates editor participation in re-aligning LLM interfaces to editorial standards through design workshops, in a case study where we design and implement an LLM-enabled encyclopedia interface with a Nordic public knowledge institution. We introduce editorial alignment as a design practice within Participatory AI, framing AI alignment as a design process and positioning the editorial standard as a design artefact that translates editorial practice and values into alignment objectives for technical implementation. Last, we discuss how editorial alignment can create space for ongoing participation and give editors agency in LLM-mediated knowledge dissemination.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。