通过可控实验揭示持续学习中遗忘的内在机制。
Sparsity, Superposition, and Forgetting: A Mechanistic Study of Representation Retention in Continual Learning

- 构建合成数据框架,精确控制特征稀疏性与重叠度。
- 发现高重叠不必然导致遗忘,关键在表征强度是否保持。
- 提出有效秩分析,揭示稀疏条件下容量分配更广。
持续学习系统常会遗忘旧知识,但真实数据中多种因素交织,难以分离遗忘机制。本文提出一个受控的简化世界框架,使机制可观测可验证。通过合成生成-分离流水线,定义真实潜空间特征,设计可调稀疏性和重叠度的任务,并引入表征强度与超叠加(特征方向重叠)的可测量指标。研究保留动态:通过SINDy方法拟合保留率、超叠加与暴露历史间的稀疏动力学关系。另以有效秩进行任务级分析,刻画表征容量在各任务间的分配。实验得三结论:(1) 超叠加随时间上升,任务边界处有瞬时下降,表明边界干扰而非持续漂移;(2) 更高稀疏性引发更多超叠加,但若表征强度保持,则遗忘仍可减少;(3) 任务级有效秩随稀疏性增加,说明稀疏条件下容量使用更广泛。结果挑战‘重叠即遗忘’的常见直觉,强调重叠需结合表征强度与容量分配共同考虑。该玩具实验提供可检验假设与诊断工具。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Continual learning (CL) systems often forget previously acquired knowledge, yet the mechanisms driving forgetting remain hard to isolate in practice because real datasets entangle many factors. We present a controlled, toy-world framework that makes these mechanisms observable and testable. Using a synthetic generator-separator pipeline, we define ground-truth latent features, build tasks with tunable sparsity and overlap, and introduce measurable quantities for representation strength and superposition (directional overlap among features). We then study retention dynamics-the temporal change of representation strength by fitting sparse dynamical relations (via SINDy) between retention, superposition, and exposure history. A complementary task-level analysis based on effective rank characterizes how representational capacity is allocated across tasks. Our controlled experiments yield three takeaways. (1) Superposition tends to increase over time with transient dips at task boundaries, suggesting boundary-specific interference rather than steady drift. (2) Higher feature sparsity induces more superposition yet does not inevitably cause forgetting; when representations remain strong, forgetting can be reduced despite overlap. (3) Task-level effective rank grows with sparsity, indicating broader capacity usage under sparse regimes. Together, these results nuance the common intuition that more superposition leads to more forgetting by showing that overlap interacts with representation strength and capacity allocation. Our toy analysis provides falsifiable hypotheses and diagnostic tools for CL.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。