HAAS Studio帮助团队在引入AI前模拟并选择最优人机任务分配方案。
HAAS Studio: A Tool for Simulating, Benchmarking, and Governing Human-AI Work Allocation

- 基于五维认知模型与多臂赌博机算法,动态优化人机协作策略。
- 支持跨六层的共进化模拟,实时监测技能退化风险。
- 适合政策制定者、流程设计师及希望科学部署人机协作的团队。
我们提出HAAS Studio,一个面向政策敏感型自适应人机任务分配的仿真与决策支持工具。该工具将HAAS框架转化为交互式环境,用于回答实际部署问题:在引入AI前,如何比较不同任务分配策略、评估治理权衡并制定可辩护的任务级操作模型?工具融合了子任务的五维认知表征、五模式协作谱、基于多臂赌博机(UCB1、折扣UCB、LinUCB、Thompson采样)的自适应分配、基于虚拟反事实后悔的分析、四重独立监管的契约式治理,以及分离高效策略与可部署选项的多准则决策支持层。它还建模了六层人机共进化过程,通过滑动窗口暴露度量和基准测试器监控技能退化风险,并借助Live Twin与Planning模块实现持续工人建模。包含软件工程、制造、医疗三个领域包,每个提供任务目录、工人画像与绩效指标词汇表,架构支持新增领域而不修改核心。发布版本含16家公司的案例与六个治理基准套件。本文聚焦工具本身,涵盖建模假设、分层架构、交互流程、内置证据资产、任务导向配方、案例研究协议及可复现演示快照。决策引导层通过结构化模式、启发式规则与决策矩阵,将基准输出转化为部署建议。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
We present HAAS Studio, a simulation and decision-support tool for policy-aware adaptive task allocation between humans and AI systems. HAAS Studio turns the HAAS framework into an interactive environment for asking a practical deployment question: before introducing AI into a workflow, how can a team compare allocation strategies, inspect governance tradeoffs, and derive a defensible task-level operating model? The tool combines a five-dimensional cognitive representation of subtasks, a five-mode collaboration spectrum, adaptive allocation with multi-armed bandits (UCB1, Discounted UCB, LinUCB, and Thompson Sampling), oracle counterfactual regret analysis, contract-based governance with four independent guards, and a multi-criteria decision-support layer that separates efficient strategies from deployable options. It also models human-AI coevolution across six layers, monitors deskilling risk through sliding-window exposure metrics and benchmark runners, and supports persistent worker modeling through Live Twin and Planning modules. Three domain packs are included: software engineering, manufacturing, and healthcare. Each provides a task catalog, worker profiles, and KPI vocabulary, while the architecture allows new domains to be added without modifying the simulation core. The release includes 16 company profiles and six governance benchmark suites. This paper focuses on the tool, including its modeling assumptions, layered architecture, interaction workflow, built-in evidence assets, task-oriented recipes, case-study protocols, and a compact reproducible demonstration snapshot. A decision-guidance layer translates benchmark outputs into deployment decisions through structured patterns, heuristics, and a decision matrix.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。