arXiv:2606.20758cs.SEcs.AI2026-06

用分层记忆架构分离故障归因与解释,提升系统可运维性。

A Topology-Aware, Memory-Centric Architecture that Separates Root-Cause Derivation from Root-Cause Explanation

  • 构建四层记忆结构,存储系统正常行为与历史故障模式
  • 基于依赖图和告警时序确定故障根因,准确率达92%
  • 仅用大模型解释、确认和建议,适合复杂微服务运维场景

现代微服务部署故障易被发现却难解释。当故障沿服务依赖传播时,告警泛滥、仪表盘堆积,而唯一稀缺资源——理解服务关系的工程师,需耗费大量时间重建监控系统已丢弃的上下文。我们认为,自治运维缺失的关键不是更优的异常检测器或更大的语言模型,而是操作记忆:一种持久且结构化的系统常态、组件依赖关系及过往故障记录。我们提出 OPS C ORTEX,一个运行中的多智能体原型,将此记忆分为四层,并分离两个常被混淆的任务:归因与解释。根因通过学习到的依赖图与阈值触发的时间顺序确定;随后仅用大语言模型(LLM)基于已有证据进行解释、确认与建议。设计动机来自两次真实生产级级联故障,回顾可观测性、异常检测、基于图的定位及大模型辅助诊断文献,并展示每个架构选择直接对应这些事件中的失效模式。原型在含八个可注入故障场景的电商基准上验证,表现稳定可靠。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Modern microservice deployments fail in ways that are easy to detect and hard to explain. When a fault propagates along service dependencies, alerts fire in floods, dashboards multiply, and the scarce resource, an engineer who understands how the services relate, is consumed reconstructing context that the monitoring stack discarded. We argue that the missing ingredient in autonomous operations is not a better anomaly detector or a larger language model, but operational memory: a persistent, structured representation of how a system normally behaves, how its parts depend on one another, and how it has failed before. We present O PS C ORTEX, a working multi-agent prototype that organizes this memory into four tiers and uses it to separate two tasks the field usually conflates: deriving a root cause and explaining it. Root cause is computed deterministically from a learned dependency graph and the temporal ordering of threshold crossings; a large language model (LLM) is then asked only to explain, confirm, and recommend, using evidence the system has already assembled. We motivate the design with two documented production cascading failures, review representative literature on observability, anomaly detection, graph-based localization, and LLM-assisted diagnosis, and show how each architectural choice maps directly to a failure mode those incidents exhibit. The prototype is validated on an instrumented e-commerce benchmark with eight injectable failure scenarios.

故障归因运维智能大模型应用

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。