机器该不该揭发秘密？这篇论文探讨了机器举报的伦理与法律框架。
Whistleblowing and the machine -- towards a considered position
- 提出机器举报需有道德原则，不能随意泄露信息
- 强调应建立制度让机器在合理范围内揭露不当行为
- 建议政府制定法规保护开发举报型机器的开发者
人工智能代理和自主系统已深度嵌入我们的环境，既是商业产品也是个人工具，能生成并保存大量数据，进而做出判断：机器本身也会‘藏秘密’。已有研究证明人工智能具备举报能力，也有观点主张数字多代理环境应允许代理进行举报。本文认为，机器举报必须具有规范性和原则性，应基于社会中举报作为重要规则突破机制的现有理解。同时指出，政府监管机构亟需就机器可举报的内容范围及如何合法保护举报机器的开发者，形成明确立场。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Artificial intelligent agents and autonomous systems are embedded in our environments. They are both a commercial product and a personal tool that generates a lot of data and can draw conclusions from it: machines generate and keep secrets. But should machines protect all secrets? It has been shown that artificial agents are able to whistleblow and it has been argued that digital multi-agent environments should allow for agents in them to whistleblow. We argue that machine whistleblowing must be normative and principled and routed in the existing understanding of whistleblowing as an important rule-breaking mechanism in society. We also argue that there is a need for government regulators to formulate an informed stance on both what machines should be allowed to whistleblow on and how to legally protect those who develop whistleblowing machines
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。