arXiv:2606.22942cs.CL2026-06

研究大模型蒸馏在后训练中的效果,发现数据少时更有效

Understanding Knowledge Distillation in Post-Training: When It Helps and When It Fails

  • 用大模型知识蒸馏小模型,提升小模型性能
  • 数据量小时蒸馏优于监督微调,数据多时优势减弱
  • 适合资源受限、数据稀缺场景的模型压缩方案

大语言模型虽性能强大,但计算成本高,难以部署于资源受限环境。知识蒸馏(KD)通过将大模型的知识迁移到小模型中,提供了一种实用解决方案。现有研究多关注特定任务或小规模设置,对构建通用指令遵循模型的后训练阶段关注不足。本文基于大规模Tulu 3数据集,系统研究了后训练阶段的KD效果。结果表明,在低数据环境下,KD优于监督微调(SFT),但随着训练数据增加,其优势逐渐减弱。若教师模型为强指令调优版本,即使数据充足仍能恢复显著性能提升,说明当学生模型无法仅从数据中获取知识时,蒸馏依然有效。我们进一步研究了领域特定的低资源场景,提出两阶段蒸馏策略:先用合成教师标注数据训练,再用人工标注数据精炼。该方法持续提升学生模型表现,为数据稀缺环境下的紧凑模型构建提供了实用指导。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance across many tasks, but their high computational cost limits deployment in resource-constrained environments. Knowledge Distillation (KD) offers a practical solution by transferring knowledge from a teacher model of a larger size to a smaller student model. While prior work has mainly examined task-specific or small-scale settings, the post-training stage for building general instruction-following models has received limited attention. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study of KD in post-training using the large-scale Tulu 3 dataset. We find that KD outperforms supervised fine-tuning (SFT) in low-data regimes, but its advantage diminishes as more training data is added. Distilling from a stronger instruction-tuned teacher restores substantial gains even with abundant data, indicating that KD remains effective when the teacher provides knowledge that the student cannot easily acquire from the training data alone. We further study domain-specific, low-resource scenarios and propose a two-stage KD strategy that leverages synthetic teacher-labeled data followed by refinement on human annotations. This method consistently improves student performance, providing practical guidance for building compact models in data-scarce environments.

知识蒸馏大模型压缩低资源学习后训练

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。