arXiv:2606.23851cs.LGcs.CV2026-06

用AI实时检测3D打印熔池异常,精度高且响应快。

Machine Learning Modeling for Real-Time Melt Pool Monitoring in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: A Hybrid Approach

  • 用预训练模型提取特征,再结合随机森林分类
  • 混合方法准确率达94.6%,单图推理仅1.15毫秒
  • 适合工厂现场部署,数据少也能高效运行

本研究探索人工智能与机器学习在激光粉末床熔融增材制造实时监控中的应用。基于在NIST AMMT平台采集的1200张镍基超合金625熔池图像,构建了二值图像分类框架,用于区分正常与异常熔池状态。采用80/20训练-测试划分,并在训练集上进一步进行90/10验证划分,图像经标准化缩放、归一化及保留标签的数据增强处理,以模拟真实工艺波动。对比三种迁移学习架构(ResNet50、EfficientNetB0、MobileNetV2)与两种随机森林方法:一种基于EfficientNetB0特征嵌入(混合模型),另一种基于原始像素特征(基准模型)。所有模型均以准确率、精确率、召回率、F1分数、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估,并记录训练时间、推理延迟及CPU/GPU使用率,以衡量实际部署可行性。混合模型在独立测试集上表现最优,F1得分为0.9451,准确率为0.9458,AUC达0.9904,单图推理时间仅为1.15毫秒;纯深度学习模型则推理延迟显著更高且准确率较低。结果表明,在数据受限环境下,将预训练卷积特征与经典集成方法结合,是实现高效、鲁棒实时熔池异常检测的有效路径。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This work investigates the implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) for real-time monitoring in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing. We developed a binary image classification framework for distinguishing normal and abnormal melt pool images using a balanced dataset of 1,200 images collected from Nickel superalloy 625 on the NIST AMMT platform. The study evaluates accuracy and inference time based on control requirements and hardware limitations of open-architecture LPBF machines. We benchmark three transfer learning architectures (ResNet50, EfficientNetB0, and MobileNetV2) against two Random Forest approaches: one trained on EfficientNetB0 feature embeddings (hybrid) and one trained on raw pixel features (baseline). Images are stratified into 80/20 train-test splits, with a further 90/10 validation split on the training set, and undergo standardized resizing, normalization, and label-preserving data augmentation to emulate realistic process variability. Each model is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), along with training time, inference latency, and CPU & GPU usage to capture deployability constraints relevant to factory-floor monitoring. The hybrid EfficientNetB0-plus-Random Forest approach achieves the best performance on the held-out test set, with an F1 score of 0.9451, accuracy of 0.9458, and AUC of 0.9904, while maintaining sub-millisecond per-image inference (1.15 ms). In contrast, purely deep learning models exhibit significantly higher inference times with lower accuracy. These results demonstrate that combining pre-trained convolutional features with classical ensemble methods provides a robust, computationally efficient route to real-time melt pool anomaly detection in data-limited additive manufacturing environments.

3D打印AI监控实时检测

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。