量子神经网络用噪声提升抗攻击能力，理论证明其稳定性机制。

Stochastic quantum neural networks (SQNNs) encode neuronal activations as qubits, synaptic topology as entanglement, and neural noise through a Lindblad master equation. A recent conference study applied a ring-entangled SQNN to collaborative intrusion detection and reached three conclusions: ring entanglement is \emph{essential} for non-local anomaly detection; an adversarial-resilience bound holds but is \emph{conservative}; and the depolarising channel \emph{fails} to act as a dropout-style regulariser, behaving instead as output noise. It left open whether a per-gate stochastic deactivation (``true quantum dropout'') could regularise where the depolarising channel could not, and whether the loose robustness bound could be replaced by a predictive theory. This paper resolves both and extends the framework to real data and to neutral-atom hardware. We give an $N$-qubit formulation through the stochastic master equation and its vectorised Liouvillian, and prove a \emph{decoherence-contraction theorem}: a depolarising channel of strength $γ$ over $L$ entangling layers contracts every weight-$w$ Pauli read-out by a factor $(1-4γ/3)^{wL}$ (for the weight-$1$ read-out used here, $(1-4γ/3)^{L}$); building on the general noise-as-defence result of Du et al., we make this quantitative and operational for intrusion detection. On the real NSL-KDD dataset under white-box FGSM and PGD attacks, a depolarising SQNN trained with the channel is, over seven seeds under strong $\ell_\infty$/$\ell_2$ attacks, significantly more robust than the noiseless circuit ($\ell_\infty$ PGD-$20$, $p=0.04$, large effect) and, critically, never suffers the catastrophic robustness collapse that the noiseless model and gradient-trained classical detectors (which fall from $95\%$ to $47\%$) do, cutting robustness variance roughly twofold; we show this robustness arises from a noise-reshaped training boundary rather than from attack-time gradient contraction. For generalisation, we derive an adaptive-penalty formula showing that per-gate dropout implements a curvature-weighted $L_2$ penalty $\tfrac{p(1-p)}{2}\sumθ^2\partial^2_θL$ in weight space, maximised at $p=1/2$, whereas depolarising noise implements an output-space penalty. A $30$-seed study confirms the formula's quantitative prediction: both mechanisms reduce the train-test gap by a small but statistically significant margin ($\approx\!0.01$; $p<10^{-4}$ and $p=0.004$), are statistically indistinguishable from each other, and the effect is concentrated where overfitting is largest; increasing the dropout rate past $1/2$ does not help, as the formula predicts. The single-seed dichotomy of prior work does not survive replication. We close with a neutral-atom realisation and a feasibility-by-$N$ analysis.