arXiv:2606.25338cs.CL2026-06

用双路径迭代检索提升复杂医学问答准确率

Hybrid-IR: Dual-Path Hybrid Retrieval with Iterative Reasoning for Complex Medical Question Answering

论文配图:Hybrid-IR: Dual-Path Hybrid Retrieval with Iterative Reasoning for Complex Medical Question Answering
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 双路检索:图结构+密集向量,兼顾知识关联与语义匹配
  • 迭代推理循环让答案逐步优化,在三个医学数据集上表现领先
  • 适合需要深度推理的临床决策支持系统开发者

大型语言模型在生物医学领域表现出色,但在医学问答中仍易产生幻觉和依赖过时知识。尽管检索增强生成(RAG)能缓解此问题,但仍存在两大局限:一是医学知识分散于多文档中,现有RAG多依赖单一检索路径,难以同时保留细粒度语义与全局结构关系;二是静态检索策略难以支撑复杂医学问答所需的深层推理。本文提出双路径迭代推理检索框架Hybrid-IR,融合图结构检索以探索结构化知识,结合密集检索实现细粒度语义匹配,并通过迭代检索-推理循环逐步优化推理路径。在三个主流医学问答基准上的实验表明,该方法显著提升了复杂医学问答的准确性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising performance across a wide range of biomedical applications, including medical question answering (QA), yet they remain prone to hallucinations and outdated knowledge. Although retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can alleviate this issue by incorporating external documents, there still exist two fundamental limitations. First, medical knowledge is often fragmented across documents, while most RAG methods rely on a single retrieval path, which makes it challenging to jointly preserve fine-grained semantic information and structured global associations. Second, static retrieval strategies are typically insufficient to support deep reasoning that is important in complex medical QA. In this paper, we present a dual-path retrieval framework with an iterative retrieval-reasoning mechanism termed "Hybrid-IR" for complex medical QA. The proposed Hybrid-IR integrates graph-based retrieval for exploration of structured knowledge and dense retrieval for fine-grained semantic matching. Moreover, the reasoning trajectory can be progressively refined through an iterative retrieve-reason loop. Experiments on three widely used medical QA benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our Hybrid-IR.

医学问答双路径检索迭代推理

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。