系统梳理图神经网络在12个领域的应用,揭示其有效边界与落地挑战。
Graph Neural Networks Applications Across Domains: All Insights You Need
- 以统一设计空间整合谱方法与空间方法,从原理推导模型表达能力
- 发现异质性与规模是多数场景下性能瓶颈,时序图仍难处理
- 强调鲁棒性、公平性等非精度因素才是部署关键,非榜单排名决定
图神经网络已从小众表征学习方法演变为具有关系结构数据的默认模型。核心问题不再是消息传递是否有效,而是图结构何时值得付出计算成本。本文基于单一设计空间组织领域,从共同原理推导谱与空间形式化,并将模型表达能力与Weisfeiler-Leman层次明确关联,阐明现有架构可分离与不可分离的模式。在此方法论基础上,分析推荐与社交网络、知识图谱与语言模型融合、药物发现与分子性质学习、医疗与神经科学、计算机视觉、交通与城市计算、电力与可再生能源系统、无线与第六代网络、欺诈与网络安全、工业预测、材料科学及气候建模共十二个领域。针对每个领域,说明图构建选择及其代价,识别主导架构及其原因,并区分真实提升与弱基线或有利划分带来的伪效。跨领域比较揭示共性规律:异质性与规模几乎在所有场景削弱同一类模型性能,时序图普遍比静态图更难处理,而排行榜领先架构很少进入实际部署。过平滑、过挤压、鲁棒性、分布偏移、公平性与可解释性不作为收尾清单,而是决定采纳的核心约束。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Graph neural networks have moved from a niche representation-learning technique to the default model class wherever data carry relational structure. The interesting question is no longer whether message passing helps on a given dataset, but where graph structure earns its computational cost and where it does not. This survey organises the field around a single design space, derives the spectral and spatial formulations from shared first principles, and connects expressive power to the Weisfeiler-Leman hierarchy with explicit statements of what current architectures can and cannot separate. Against that methodological backbone we examine twelve application domains, among them recommendation and social networks, knowledge graphs and language-model integration, drug discovery and molecular property learning, healthcare and neuroscience, computer vision, traffic and urban computing, power and renewable-energy systems, wireless and sixth-generation networks, fraud and cybersecurity, industrial prognostics, materials science, and climate modelling. For each domain we specify the graph-construction choices and their costs, identify which architecture families dominate and why, and separate reported gains from artefacts of weak baselines or favourable splits. A cross-domain comparison exposes recurring patterns: heterophily and scale undercut the same models almost everywhere, temporal graphs remain harder than their static counterparts, and the architectures that top public leaderboards are seldom the ones that reach deployment. We treat over-smoothing, over-squashing, robustness, distribution shift, fairness, and explainability not as a closing checklist but as the constraints that decide adoption.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。