arXiv:2606.28334cs.CYcs.AI2026-06

AI检测社交媒体自杀风险依赖间接标签,难真正识别高危个体。

Ground Truths in Suicide Research: The Current State of AI-Based Suicide Detection in Social Media

  • 用语言特征和社区归属推断风险,非直接个体验证
  • 95%研究基于间接标签,仅分类含自残语言的帖子
  • 适合关注伦理与数据局限性的研究者参考

人工智能与社交媒体数据的结合催生了大规模自杀风险检测的乐观预期,但其实证基础仍不清晰。本文综合22篇系统综述(截至2022年)及持续更新的文献分析,共识别出195项相关研究,其关键特征与发现详见补充材料。分析显示,该领域发展迅速,集中于少数平台,依赖文本与英文数据,重复使用相似数据集。最重要的是,多数研究采用间接标注策略,未对个体风险进行直接验证。真实“地面真值”通常通过在线内容的可观察特征(如语言标记、社群归属)推断,导致预测任务从识别高危个体转变为分类含自残语言的帖子。这限制了模型对未明确表达情绪的个体的检测能力。因此,当前模型性能提升需谨慎看待。未来进展更依赖于模型预测与真实生活中的自杀风险之间的对应关系,而非单纯优化算法表现。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and social media data have led to growing optimism about the ability to detect suicide risk at scale. However, the empirical foundations of this work remain unclear. This article provides a synthesis of current research on AI-based suicide detection in social media, drawing on a recent umbrella review of 22 systematic reviews covering studies up to 2022, alongside an ongoing literature review extending the analysis to more recent work. Across these sources, we identified 195 relevant studies, which are documented in a detailed supplementary dataset outlining their key characteristics and findings (see Supplementary Information). Analysis of these studies reveals consistent patterns, including rapid growth, concentration on a small number of platforms, reliance on textual and English-language data, and repeated use of similar datasets. Most importantly, the majority of studies rely on indirect labeling strategies that do not involve direct, individual-level validation of suicide risk. Instead, ground truth is typically inferred from observable features of online content, such as linguistic markers or community membership. As a result, the predictive task often shifts from identifying individuals at risk to classifying posts that contain suicidal or distress-related language, limiting the ability of current approaches to detect individuals who do not express such content explicitly online. These findings suggest that current advances in model performance should be interpreted with caution. Progress in this field is likely to depend less on improving model performance and more on ensuring that model predictions meaningfully correspond to suicide risk as it is experienced in real life.

自杀检测数据标注伦理风险

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。