arXiv:2606.28562cs.CL2026-06被引 2

通过熵引导的自适应监督,让强化学习蒸馏更智能地分配注意力。

SEAD: Competence-Aware On-Policy Distillation via Entropy-Guided Supervision

论文配图:SEAD: Competence-Aware On-Policy Distillation via Entropy-Guided Supervision
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用熵值判断学生能力,动态选择需监督的文本片段
  • 在六项数学任务上比传统方法平均提升4.8%准确率
  • 适合追求高效强化学习蒸馏的研究者与工程师

在线策略蒸馏(OPD)存在一个离线蒸馏和强化学习中不存在的特性:教师监督质量依赖于学生的能力水平。能力不足时产生的不连贯轨迹会带来噪声梯度,而已掌握的标记则产生冗余梯度,造成三个层面的浪费(单个标记、训练阶段、提示)。现有方法对所有内容统一监督,效率低下。我们提出SEAD,利用熵作为统一探针,检测三尺度上的能力依赖性退化:(1) 联合教师-学生熵将标记划分为不同区域,仅对特定区域施加差异损失或置零梯度(约50%标记被跳过);(2) 采用余弦调度,随能力增长从正向KL逐渐过渡到反向KL;(3) 采用基于能力的课程机制,按由易到难引入提示。这些组件相互依存:标记选择需要连贯轨迹(依赖课程),调度需单调提升(也依赖课程)。在OLMo-3(7B至32B)上,SEAD在六个数学基准上平均准确率较原始OPD提升4.8%,消融实验证明其交互具有超加性效应。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

On-policy distillation (OPD) has a property absent in offline distillation and RL: teacher supervision quality depends on student competence. Incoherent rollouts yield noisy gradients; already-mastered tokens yield redundant ones. This creates waste at three scales (tokens, training phases, and prompts) yet existing methods supervise uniformly. We introduce SEAD, which uses entropy as a unified probe of this competence-dependent degradation at three scales: (1) joint teacher-student entropy partitions tokens into zones receiving tailored divergences or zero gradient (approx. 50% skipped); (2) a cosine schedule anneals from forward to reverse KL as competence grows; (3) a competence-gated curriculum introduces prompts easy-to-hard. These components are symbiotically necessary: token selection requires coherent rollouts (curriculum), annealing requires monotonic improvement (also curriculum). On OLMo-3 (7B to 32B), SEAD achieves +4.8 avg accuracy over vanilla OPD across six math benchmarks, with ablations confirming super-additive interactions.

强化学习知识蒸馏自适应监督模型效率

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。