用拓扑空洞分析法,从技术文献中自动发现有潜力的创新点。
Topological Void Analysis A Mathematical Framework for Systematic Technical Innovation Discovery in Knowledge Spaces
- 构建稠密-稀疏混合嵌入空间,识别语义连贯但未被探索的三元组
- 在14万篇文档中发现2128个创新候选,90%通过质量筛选
- 适合需要系统性创新发现的研究者和专利布局团队
在操作系统或软硬件协同设计等密集技术领域中,确定创新方向本质上是高维知识空间中的搜索问题。现有方法依赖关键词检索、引用邻近性或人类直觉,均无法形式化定义既相关又未被覆盖的空白区域。本文提出拓扑空洞分析(TVA),将拓扑空洞定义为稠密-稀疏混合嵌入空间中的三元组(A, B, C)。空洞需满足三个条件:(i) 概念A与B均与领域锚点C语义连贯;(ii) A与B间相似度处于校准后的边缘区间,避免明显组合或无关噪声;(iii) 二者共享稀疏词汇桥接,且嵌入超球面上的测地线中点为空。应用于约14万篇索引文献,TVA生成2128个创新候选,覆盖96个目标;90%通过自动化质量过滤,经四位专家对抗式评审后获191项REVISE与1项APPROVE verdict(端到端成功率0.05%)。两个案例研究显示,该框架能挖掘非显性的连接关系,而非仅发现明显关联对。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Identifying where to innovate in a dense technical domain - such as operating systems or hardware/software co-design - is fundamentally a search problem in a high-dimensional knowledge space. Existing approaches rely on keyword search, citation proximity, or human intuition, none of which formalise the notion of an unexplored region that is simultaneously relevant to a target goal and absent from prior art. We present Topological Void Analysis (TVA), a mathematical framework that defines topological voids as triads (A, B, C) in a dense-sparse hybrid embedding space. A void requires three conditions: (i) both concepts A and B are semantically cohesive with domain anchor C; (ii) their pairwise similarity falls within a calibrated marginality band - avoiding both obvious combinations and unrelated noise; and (iii) they share a sparse lexical bridge while the geodesic midpoint on the embedding hypersphere is unoccupied. Applied to ~140k indexed documents, TVA generates 2,128 invention candidates across 96 targets; 90% survive automated quality filtering, yielding 191 REVISE and 1 APPROVE verdict from four-specialist adversarial review (0.05% end-to-end). Two case studies demonstrate the framework surfaces non-obvious connective tissue rather than merely obvious related pairs.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。