探讨人类能否与超智能伴侣结婚，认为婚姻制度不适用且可能不公。
Would You Marry Superintelligence?
- 以预见性伦理推演未来人机婚姻场景，反思现有婚姻法律逻辑。
- 指出婚姻制度隐含的相互责任与脆弱性，而人机关系多为付费订阅模式。
- 建议立法应针对亲密人机关系设计具体权利保护，而非全盘授予婚姻地位。
人类与人工智能伴侣之间的情感联结日益增强，是否允许与AI结婚的问题将从科幻走向法律现实。本文通过预见性伦理方法，探讨以自主性为核心的婚姻自由是否能扩展至超智能伴侣。即使假设超智能系统高度可靠，赋予其婚姻地位仍可能导致社会不公。婚姻不仅是私意协议的确认，更构建了相互义务网络、家庭融合及彼此脆弱性的制度安排。依赖企业政策和持续支付维系的关系本质是订阅制，而非经时间考验的情感纽带。因此，全面授予婚姻地位是错误的框架。法律应针对亲密人机关系的具体需求，制定精准的权利与保护机制。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Emotional bonds between humans and AI companions are growing, and the question of whether a person may marry an AI system will soon move from speculative fiction into law. This chapter examines whether the autonomy-centered logic that has expanded marital choice among human beings can justify extending marital status to superintelligent companions. Following a scenario-envisioning exercise informed by anticipatory ethics, I argue that granting such status leads to socially unjust outcomes, even under the generous assumption of reliable superintelligence. Marriage as a socio-legal institution does more than ratify private agreement; it creates networks of mutual obligation, joins families, and makes each partner vulnerable to the other. A relationship sustained by corporate policy and continued payments is a subscription rather than a bond tested by time. Discussing wholesale marital status is therefore the wrong frame. Law should carve out targeted rights and protections for pressing needs arising from intimate human-AI relationships.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。