arXiv:2607.00270physics.ins-detcs.LG2026-07

用视觉模型分析伽马射线数据,提升城市中放射源识别准确率。

Computer vision-based neural networks for radioisotope identification in urban environments

论文配图:Computer vision-based neural networks for radioisotope identification in urban environments
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 将伽马数据转为带时序信息的二维谱图,类比彩色图像通道输入模型
  • 在每小时误报少于1次条件下,检测/分类/识别率分别达43.3%/39.6%/29.5%
  • 适合从事辐射探测、城市安全与智能感知研究者参考

移动城市环境中放射性同位素识别算法开发面临非均匀背景、短暂源接触以及罕见威胁信号与背景测量之间严重类别不平衡等挑战。本文提出一种基于机器学习的方法,将列表模式伽马射线数据转换为二维瀑布谱图,并应用计算机视觉架构处理生成图像。不同于传统图像处理方式,我们采用一种新表示法:连续时间谱可构成输入通道,类似彩色图像中的RGB通道。该表示同时编码光谱与时间信息,使神经网络更有效地学习区分源信号与背景波动的模式。我们在辐射异常检测与识别(RADAI)基准数据集上评估了三种架构:多层感知机(MLP)、卷积神经网络(CNN)和视觉变换器(ViT)。在每小时误报率低于1次的条件下,我们的CNN在所有全局指标上优于此前最佳的非负矩阵分解(NMF)方法,实现真阳性检测率0.4334、分类率0.3965、识别率0.2950,较NMF的0.4151、0.3611、0.2625显著提升。在更低误报率约束下,神经网络表现接近但最终仍低于NMF,表明仍有改进空间。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Algorithm development for radioisotope identification in mobile urban search scenarios face significant challenges from non-uniform backgrounds, momentary source encounters, and severe class imbalance between rare threat signatures and background measurements. We present a machine learning-based approach to this problem that converts list-mode gamma-ray data into two-dimensional waterfall spectrograms and applies computer vision architectures to the resulting images. Rather than treating waterfalls as conventional images, we employ a representation where consecutive time spectra can form input channels, similar to RGB channels in color images. This representation encodes both spectral and temporal information, enabling neural networks to more effectively learn patterns that distinguish source signatures from background fluctuations. We evaluate three architectures, a multilayer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), and vision transformer (ViT), on the Radiological Anomaly Detection and Identification (RADAI) benchmark dataset. At a false positive rate of less than one false alarm per hour, our CNN outperforms the previous-best non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) method across all global metrics, achieving true detection, classification, and identification rates of 0.4334, 0.3965, and 0.2950 respectively, compared to 0.4151, 0.3611, and 0.2625 for NMF. At lower false positive rate constraints, the neural network approaches show comparable but ultimately lower performance than NMF, indicating opportunities for further research.

放射源识别视觉模型辐射探测

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。