分析30年81国文献,发现各国信息科学方法使用差异及演变趋势。
Non-synchronism in Global Usage of Research Methods in Library and Information Science from 1990 to 2019
- 通过人工标注与深度学习模型自动分类5281篇论文方法
- 各国研究方法分布各异,相同主题用法也不同
- 国际方法差异缩小,适合关注学科发展比较的研究者
图书馆与信息科学(LIS)的全球发展受经济、社会、文化、学科传统等多重因素影响,导致各国研究方法差异显著。为深入理解这一现象,我们分析了过去30年发表在国际代表性期刊上的5,281篇来自81个国家的研究论文。通过内容分析人工标注部分文献的方法,并训练深度学习模型实现研究方法的自动分类。基于此,开展跨国比较研究。结果表明,各国存在独特的研究方法特征与分布模式,即使研究同一主题,方法选择仍可能不同。同时,国家间与国际整体方法分布存在差异,但近30年来该差距逐渐缩小。本研究从方法视角揭示各国学科发展特点,有助于指导国家层面的学科建设,促进国际协作与理解。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The global development of Library and Information Science (LIS) is influenced by various factors such as the economy, society, culture, discipline, tradition, and more. Consequently, the research methods of LIS vary greatly among countries. To better understand these differences, we conducted a study of 5,281 research papers from 81 countries published in internationally representative journals over the past thirty years. We manually annotated the research methods used in some articles through content analysis, and subsequently developed and trained a deep learning model for automatic classification of research methods. Using this method, we conducted a comparative analysis of the usage of research methods in different countries. Our findings reveal that there are differences in the research methods used across countries, with each country having its unique research profile and distribution of research methods. Even when investigating the same topic, research methods can differ between countries. Our study also uncovers that there are differences between the national and international distribution of research methods, these differences have decreased over the past 30 years. By highlighting the characteristics of discipline development in various countries from the perspective of research methods, our study can help guide discipline development at the national level. This study provides insights into the usage trends of research methods across different countries and highlights the unique characteristics of discipline development in each country. This information can be valuable in promoting collaboration and understanding between countries and in guiding discipline development at the national level.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。