arXiv:2607.02459cs.CL2026-07中稿 · ACL

语言模型测量文化时,本身就在塑造文化,而非被动记录。

Language Models as Measurement Apparatus for Culture

论文配图:Language Models as Measurement Apparatus for Culture
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用'能动性切割'理论揭示模型设计如何建构文化边界
  • 案例显示模型对影视对话的结构、互动与偏差测量受自身内化文化影响
  • 强调研究需兼具理论深度、实证严谨与文化敏感性

语言模型被广泛用于量化文化现象,但此类测量的独特之处何在?本文认为,自然语言处理中的文化研究是一种物质-话语实践:测量工具(模型、数据、标注、评估)参与构建其所测量的文化现实,而非被动记录。基于凯伦·巴德的‘能动性切割’概念——现象与工具之间偶然的界限——本文指出,工具的设计选择划定了这一界限,而该界限从一开始就纠缠不清,因为语言模型已内化了其测量所需的文化素材。通过三个关于影视剧对白的案例研究(测量结构、互动、偏离)及三个对工具本身的考察(文化标记的抹除、对历史材料的敏感度、代理工作流中的能动性),本文提出一个以理论驱动、实证严谨且文化依赖的研究方案,将每个能动性切割视为方法论与伦理上的自觉承诺。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Language models are increasingly used to quantify cultural phenomena, but what makes such measurement distinctively cultural? This paper argues that NLP work on culture is a material-discursive practice: the apparatus -- model, data, annotation, evaluation -- participates in constituting the cultural reality it measures, rather than passively recording it. Drawing on Karen Barad's concept of the agential cut -- the contingent boundary between phenomenon and instrument -- I show that the apparatus's substantive design choices draw such boundaries, and that the boundary is entangled from the start because language models have already internalized much of the cultural material they measure. I illustrate this through three case studies on television and film dialogue (measuring structure, interaction, and deviation) and three examinations of the apparatus itself (erasure of cultural markers, attunement to historical material, and agency in an agentic workflow). This big picture analysis proposes a research program that is theory-driven, empirically rigorous, and culturally contingent, treating each agential cut as a conscious commitment, at once methodological and ethical.

文化测量语言模型能动性切割方法论

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。