arXiv:2607.04407physics.flu-dyncs.LG2026-07

用复数线性算子高效预测共振声场,比传统方法更准更快。

Quadrature-Aware Complex-Linear Neural Operator for Boundary-to-Field Prediction in Resonant Acoustics

论文配图:Quadrature-Aware Complex-Linear Neural Operator for Boundary-to-Field Prediction in Resonant Acoustics
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 构建复数线性边界算子,通过积分权重显式耦合源与接收点。
  • 平均场误差仅0.184,是DeepONet的一半,且超算混合源场景仍稳定。
  • 适合需快速高保真声场预测的工程场景,如振动噪声仿真加速。

在每次源分布变化时都需要重新进行波传播模拟,导致声场重复预测计算成本高昂。本文提出一种基于积分权重的复数线性边界算子(CLBO),将振动表面的复数法向速度映射到接收点的复数压力。该模型通过显式的复数表面积分收缩,使边界激励以线性方式输入,自然保持复数叠加、齐次性及零激励响应等物理特性;同时以坐标、法向量和积分权重表示源,而非固定向量化输入。参考数据由经过验证的三维多重松弛时间(MRT)格子玻尔兹曼求解器生成,并存储为与求解器无关的边界-场格式。在相同数据划分与优化设置下,CLBO与固定传感器复数DeepONet对比,测试涵盖结构一致性、接收点坐标插值、源离散化、源族留出、标签效率、物理信息消融、未见源组合及计算成本。五次训练种子下,CLBO的平均复数相对场误差为0.184 ± 0.00771,优于DeepONet的0.367 ± 0.00742;其源叠加误差仅为1.31×10⁻⁷,新模拟混合源案例平均误差0.237,低于DeepONet的0.415。推理速度比参考计算快1.83×10⁴倍。结果表明,强制复数线性结构显著提升物理一致性与分布式声激励下的泛化能力。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Repeated prediction of acoustic fields from spatially distributed boundary excitation is computationally expensive when each source realization requires a new wave simulation. This work introduces a quadrature-aware complex-linear boundary operator (CLBO) that maps complex normal velocity on a vibrating surface to complex pressure at receiver locations. The model couples learned source and receiver basis functions through an explicit complex surface-quadrature contraction, so the boundary excitation enters linearly by construction. This preserves complex superposition, homogeneity, and zero response to zero excitation, while representing the source through coordinates, normals, and quadrature weights rather than a fixed flattened input vector. Reference data were generated using a verified three-dimensional multiple-relaxation-time (MRT) lattice Boltzmann solver and stored in a solver-agnostic boundary-to-field format. CLBO was compared with a fixed-sensor complex DeepONet under matched case splits and optimization settings, with additional tests of structural consistency, receiver-coordinate interpolation, source discretization, source-family holdout, label efficiency, physics-informed ablations, unseen source mixtures, and computational cost. Across five training seeds, CLBO achieved a mean complex relative field error of 0.184 +/- 0.00771, compared with 0.367 +/- 0.00742 for DeepONet. Its measured source-superposition error was 1.31 x 10^-7, and its mean error on newly simulated mixed-source cases was 0.237, compared with 0.415 for DeepONet. Inference was 1.83 x 10^4 faster than the reference calculation for the reported query size. These results show that enforcing the known complex-linear boundary-to-field structure improves physical consistency and generalization under distributed acoustic excitation.

声场预测神经算子复数建模物理增强

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。