arXiv:2607.05748cs.LG2026-07

通过学习毒化样本的参照模型,精准识别并清除后门

Two Sides of the Same Coin: Learning the Backdoor to Remove the Backdoor

论文配图:Two Sides of the Same Coin: Learning the Backdoor to Remove the Backdoor
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 反向思路:训练毒化样本的参照模型,而非正常样本
  • 在多种攻击和数据集上,后门成功率接近零
  • 适合需要高安全性的模型防御场景

近期研究提出多种训练阶段防御方法以应对数据投毒引入的神经网络后门。基于模型对毒化样本的学习速度远快于良性样本的观察,现有方法或采用固定损失阈值进行划分,或迭代学习一个作为参考的良性样本模型。我们提出的方法HARVEY采用相似但关键不同的策略:学习毒化样本的参照模型,而非良性样本。由于构建带毒参照模型比构建良性参照模型容易得多,因此可更准确地识别毒化样本。这一核心差异使我们在评估中实现了近乎完美的后门移除效果。HARVEY在不同攻击类型、数据集和模型架构下均显著优于现有方法,将攻击成功率降至最低,同时自然准确率损失极小。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The community has recently developed various training-time defenses to counter neural backdoors introduced through data poisoning. In light of the observation that a model learns poisonous samples responsible for the backdoor easier than benign samples, these approaches either use a fixed threshold of the training loss for splitting or iteratively learn a reference model as an oracle for identifying benign samples. In particular, the latter has proven effective for anti-backdoor learning. Our method, HARVEY, leverages a similar yet crucially different technique: learning an oracle for poisonous rather than benign samples. Learning a backdoored reference model is significantly easier than learning a reference model on benign data. Consequently, we can identify poisonous samples much more accurately than related work identifies benign samples. This crucial difference enables near-perfect backdoor removal as we demonstrate in our evaluation. HARVEY substantially outperforms related approaches across attack types, datasets, and architectures, lowering the attack success rate to the very minimum at a negligible loss in natural accuracy. The figure below shows an overview of our methods working principle.

后门防御数据投毒模型安全

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。