arXiv:2607.09094cs.CLcs.AI2026-07

用图神经网络和修辞角色分析,提升法律判例检索精度

PRecG: Legal Precedent Retrieval with Graph Neural Networks and Rhetorical Role Segmentation

论文配图:PRecG: Legal Precedent Retrieval with Graph Neural Networks and Rhetorical Role Segmentation
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 按句子修辞角色拆分判例,构建法律实体关系图
  • 通过图神经网络学习实体上下文表示,生成段落级嵌入
  • 在印度法律数据集上优于现有方法,适合法律AI研究者

法律判例检索是案件准备、诉讼策略和法律研究的基础任务。现有自动检索方法将法律文档映射到低维语义空间,基于表示相似性计算匹配度,但将文档视为整体文本,忽略其修辞结构。这导致未能捕捉法律概念的细微含义及其在不同修辞角色下的上下文意义差异。为此,我们提出PRecG流程,通过分层学习实现判例对之间的相似性计算。首先根据句子的修辞角色将文档分解为多个语义单元(段落);针对每个段落构建知识图谱以捕捉其中的法律实体及其关系;利用上下文表示学习与聚合生成段落级嵌入;再整合各段嵌入得到文档级统一表示,并最终计算两份文档间的语义相似性。我们在基准印度法律数据集上进行了大量实验,与当前最优基线对比,验证了该方法的有效性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Legal precedent retrieval is a fundamental task in legal case preparation, planning, litigation strategy, and legal research. Current approaches for automatic precedent retrieval map legal documents to a low-dimensional semantic space and compute similarity based on the proximity of their representations. These approaches treat legal documents as monolithic texts, ignoring the rhetorical organization of the legal technicalities. Ergo, they overlook nuanced legal meanings and fail to distinguish the contextual significance of legal entities and concepts that vary based on their rhetorical roles within the document. To address this insufficiency, we propose the PRecG pipeline that computes the similarity between pairs of legal judgments by hierarchically learning their representations. The process begins by decomposing each document into distinct semantic units (segments) based on the rhetorical roles of sentences. For each rhetorical segment, a knowledge graph is constructed to capture the legal entities and their relationships within the segment. Contextual representations of the entities are then learned and aggregated to derive segment-level embeddings. These embeddings are further integrated to produce a unified document-level representation, and finally, the semantic similarity between a pair of documents is computed. We validate the performance of the proposed approach through extensive experiments on a benchmark Indian legal dataset, comparing it against state-of-the-art baselines to demonstrate its effectiveness.

法律AI图神经网络信息检索

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。